SULR vs. TCV
SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and TCV (Towle Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SULR is a Actively Managed fund actively managed by Guinness Atkinson, while TCV is a Small Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Towle. Both are actively managed. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for TCV.
Performance
SULR vs. TCV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SULR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TCV
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- 2.06%
- 6M
- 16.12%
- YTD
- 24.97%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SULR vs. TCV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 24.97% | 2.99% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SULR vs. TCV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Towle Value ETF (TCV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SULR vs. TCV - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SULR | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -12.23% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -0.69% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.35% | — |
Volatility
SULR vs. TCV - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SULR | TCV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 21.26% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 21.26% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 21.26% | — |
SULR vs. TCV - Expense Ratio Comparison
SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than TCV's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
SULR vs. TCV - Dividend Comparison
SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.58%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.28% | 2.62% |
TCV Towle Value ETF | 0.58% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, SULR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SULR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for TCV.
TCV has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.
SULR is categorized as Actively Managed, while TCV is Small Cap Value Equities. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Towle. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.85% for TCV.
Find the right allocation for SULR and TCV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer