SULR vs. STRN
SULR (SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF) and STRN (SMART Trend ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. SULR charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for STRN.
Performance
SULR vs. STRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
SULR
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STRN
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- 3.03%
- 6M
- 21.56%
- YTD
- 26.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SULR vs. STRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 26.14% | 10.48% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SULR vs. STRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and SMART Trend ETF (STRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SULR vs. STRN - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SULR | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -15.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -3.67% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -2.92% | — |
Volatility
SULR vs. STRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SULR | STRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 26.65% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 26.65% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 26.65% | — |
SULR vs. STRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than STRN's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
SULR vs. STRN - Dividend Comparison
SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STRN SMART Trend ETF | 0.15% | 0.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SULR SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.46% | 0.28% | 2.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, STRN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
STRN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SULR.
STRN has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.
They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and SmartWay. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.59% for STRN.
Find the right allocation for SULR and STRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer