PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SULR vs. BDBT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SULR vs. BDBT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


SULR

1D
1M
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BDBT

1D
0.12%
1M
0.13%
6M
0.06%
YTD
0.10%
1Y
3.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SULR vs. BDBT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
SULR
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF
0.00%0.00%
BDBT
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
0.10%3.70%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SULR vs. BDBT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SULR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BDBT
BDBT Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BDBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDBT Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
BDBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDBT Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SULR vs. BDBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF (SULR) and Bluemonte Core Bond ETF (BDBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SULRBDBTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.32

SULR vs. BDBT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SULR vs. BDBT - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SULRBDBTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

Volatility

SULR vs. BDBT - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SULRBDBTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.87%

SULR vs. BDBT - Expense Ratio Comparison

SULR has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than BDBT's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

SULR vs. BDBT - Dividend Comparison

SULR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BDBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.87%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
BDBT
Bluemonte Core Bond ETF
3.87%2.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SULR
SmartETFs Sustainable Energy II ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.46%0.28%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, BDBT is cheaper at 0.23% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BDBT is cheaper with a 0.23% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for SULR.

BDBT has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.00% for SULR.

SULR is categorized as Actively Managed, while BDBT is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: Guinness Atkinson and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for SULR and 0.23% for BDBT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SULR and BDBT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer