PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SUJA.L (iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and XDNS.L (Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D) are both Japan Equities funds tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, from iShares and DWS respectively. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, SUJA.L returned 4.37%/yr vs 9.38%/yr for XDNS.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SUJA.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for XDNS.L.

Performance

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUJA.L achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than XDNS.L's 15.48% return.

SUJA.L

1D
-0.04%
1M
7.15%
YTD
3.53%
6M
2.52%
1Y
13.20%
3Y*
6.15%
5Y*
4.37%
10Y*
—

XDNS.L

1D
-0.57%
1M
6.27%
YTD
15.48%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
14.60%
5Y*
9.38%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUJA.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		3.53%11.08%4.65%7.41%-8.78%2.14%13.75%18.34%-9.18%6.25%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D		15.48%16.58%9.87%11.58%-7.42%1.12%12.12%14.51%-10.22%7.84%

Correlation

The correlation between SUJA.L and XDNS.L is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2017

0.78

The correlation between SUJA.L and XDNS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
SUJA.L
XDNS.L

Industrials

21.6%
25.8%

Technology

19.5%
19.8%

Financial Services

18.0%
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
11.3%

Communication Services

12.2%
8.8%

Healthcare

7.6%
7.0%

Real Estate

3.0%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
2.6%

Basic Materials

1.9%
3.2%

Energy

-

-

Utilities

-

0.6%

Industrials

SUJA.L
21.6%
XDNS.L
25.8%

Technology

SUJA.L
19.5%
XDNS.L
19.8%

Financial Services

SUJA.L
18.0%
XDNS.L
18.5%

Consumer Cyclical

SUJA.L
13.5%
XDNS.L
11.3%

Communication Services

SUJA.L
12.2%
XDNS.L
8.8%

Healthcare

SUJA.L
7.6%
XDNS.L
7.0%

Real Estate

SUJA.L
3.0%
XDNS.L
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

SUJA.L
2.7%
XDNS.L
2.6%

Basic Materials

SUJA.L
1.9%
XDNS.L
3.2%

Energy

SUJA.L

-

XDNS.L

-

Utilities

SUJA.L

-

XDNS.L
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D

Often compared with SUJA.L:
SUJA.L vs. CSJP.LSUJA.L vs. IJPH.LSUJA.L vs. JPSR.LSUJA.L vs. PRIJ.LSUJA.L vs. FJPS.LSUJA.L vs. XDJP.LSUJA.L vs. IJPN.L
Often compared with XDNS.L:
XDNS.L vs. X7PP.LXDNS.L vs. XDJP.LXDNS.L vs. JPXNXDNS.L vs. IJPN.LXDNS.L vs. XBCU.LXDNS.L vs. XNNS.LXDNS.L vs. XCNA.L

Return for Risk

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
SUJA.L
SUJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
XDNS.L
XDNS.L Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDNS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

SUJA.LXDNS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.73
2.09

-1.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.16
2.91

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.39

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.24

3.81

-2.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

11.43

-7.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the XDNS.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUJA.L and XDNS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

SUJA.LXDNS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

2.09

-1.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.68

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.66

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.60

-0.27

Drawdowns

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUJA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.81%, roughly equal to the maximum XDNS.L drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUJA.L and XDNS.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

SUJA.LXDNS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.81%

-24.75%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.57%

-10.70%

+0.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.83%

-14.32%

+1.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.93%

-19.29%

-1.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-24.75%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.80%

-0.57%

-1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.00%

-5.35%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

4.04%

-0.31%

Volatility

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.72% compared to Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D (XDNS.L) at 3.89%. This indicates that SUJA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDNS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

SUJA.LXDNS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.72%

3.89%

+0.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.49%

14.64%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.02%

19.56%

-1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.59%

17.83%

-2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

17.31%

-0.28%

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUJA.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XDNS.L's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUJA.L vs. XDNS.L - Dividend Comparison

SUJA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XDNS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.

PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SUJA.L
iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XDNS.L
Xtrackers MSCI Japan ESG Screened UCITS ETF 1D		1.43%1.63%1.65%1.81%2.83%1.46%1.79%1.77%1.20%1.97%0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

SUJA.L and XDNS.L have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDNS.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDNS.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SUJA.L.

Both ETFs track TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SUJA.L and 0.15% for XDNS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUJA.L and XDNS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer