SUJA.L vs. QTOP

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

SUJA.L (iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QTOP (iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - SUJA.L is a Japan Equities fund tracking the TOPIX TR JPY, while QTOP is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SUJA.L returned 14.21% vs 41.13% for QTOP. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.20% expense ratio.

Performance

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

SUJA.L is traded in GBp, while QTOP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QTOP values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUJA.L achieves a 3.53% return, which is significantly lower than QTOP's 16.79% return.

SUJA.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 4.35%
• YTD: 3.53%
• 6M: 3.22%
• 1Y: 14.21%
• 3Y*: 6.15%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: —

QTOP

• 1D: -4.49%
• 1M: 2.29%
• YTD: 16.79%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: 41.13%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
SUJA.L iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	3.53%	11.08%	3.84%
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	16.79%	13.49%	9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SUJA.L and QTOP is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2024	0.25

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	SUJA.L	QTOP
Industrials	21.6%	0.9%
Technology	19.5%	57.7%
Financial Services	18.0%	-
Consumer Cyclical	13.5%	10.4%
Communication Services	12.2%	17.7%
Healthcare	7.6%	3.3%
Real Estate	3.0%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.7%	8.5%
Basic Materials	1.9%	1.5%
Energy	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

SUJA.L vs. QTOP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUJA.L

SUJA.L Risk / Return Rank: 24
SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 22
SUJA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
SUJA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 26

QTOP

QTOP Risk / Return Rank: 63
QTOP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
QTOP Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
QTOP Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QTOP Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
QTOP Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) and iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUJA.L	QTOP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	2.38	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.16	2.98	-1.83
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.42	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.24	3.22	-1.98
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.53	9.49	-5.96
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUJA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the QTOP Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUJA.L and QTOP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUJA.L	QTOP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	2.38	-1.65
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.28	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.32	1.15	-0.83

Drawdowns

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUJA.L drawdown since its inception was -23.81%, smaller than the maximum QTOP drawdown of -25.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUJA.L and QTOP.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUJA.L	QTOP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-23.81%	-25.56%	+1.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.57%	-12.83%	+2.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.93%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.80%	-5.21%	+3.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.00%	-5.25%	-1.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.73%	4.34%	-0.61%

Volatility

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SUJA.L) is 4.72%, while iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF (QTOP) has a volatility of 6.59%. This indicates that SUJA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QTOP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	SUJA.L	QTOP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.72%	6.59%	-1.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.49%	13.08%	+1.41%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.02%	17.38%	+0.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.59%	22.91%	-7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.03%	22.91%	-5.88%

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SUJA.L and QTOP have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

SUJA.L vs. QTOP - Dividend Comparison

SUJA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QTOP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
QTOP iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF	0.34%	0.38%	0.11%
SUJA.L iShares MSCI Japan SRI UCITS ETF USD (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUJA.L and QTOP in my portfolio?

SUJA.L and QTOP have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUJA.L or QTOP?

Both ETFs have the same 0.20% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUJA.L or QTOP?

SUJA.L and QTOP have the same expense ratio: 0.20% per year.

What is the main difference between SUJA.L and QTOP?

SUJA.L is categorized as Japan Equities, while QTOP is Nasdaq-100. SUJA.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY, while QTOP tracks Nasdaq-100 Top 30 Index.