SUIS vs. CBXJ

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

SUIS (Canary Staked SUI ETF) and CBXJ (Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January) are both Blockchain funds. SUIS is passively managed, while CBXJ is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SUIS charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for CBXJ.

Performance

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canary Staked SUI ETF (SUIS) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SUIS

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -1.43%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CBXJ

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: -0.40%
• 6M: -11.93%
• YTD: -11.28%
• 1Y: -25.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF	-22.89%
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	-3.06%

Correlation

The correlation between SUIS and CBXJ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 18, 2026	0.84

Return for Risk

SUIS vs. CBXJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUIS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CBXJ

CBXJ Risk / Return Rank: 1
CBXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
CBXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 1
CBXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CBXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canary Staked SUI ETF (SUIS) and Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January (CBXJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SUIS	CBXJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.39	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.96	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.78	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.81	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.26	—

Drawdowns

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUIS drawdown since its inception was -48.70%, which is greater than CBXJ's maximum drawdown of -30.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUIS and CBXJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUIS	CBXJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-48.70%	-30.16%	-18.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.16%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.72%	-28.94%	-14.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.86%	-11.93%	-7.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	19.40%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SUIS	CBXJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	2.29%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.69%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	81.08%	17.64%	+63.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	81.08%	16.26%	+64.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	81.08%	16.26%	+64.82%

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUIS has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than CBXJ's 0.69% expense ratio.

Dividends

SUIS vs. CBXJ - Dividend Comparison

SUIS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CBXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.

Position	TTM	2025
CBXJ Calamos Bitcoin 90 Series Structured Alt Protection ETF - January	2.22%	1.97%
SUIS Canary Staked SUI ETF	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SUIS and CBXJ in my portfolio?

SUIS and CBXJ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SUIS or CBXJ?

On fees, CBXJ is cheaper at 0.69% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SUIS or CBXJ?

CBXJ is cheaper with a 0.69% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for SUIS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SUIS or CBXJ?

CBXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.22%, compared with 0.00% for SUIS.

What is the main difference between SUIS and CBXJ?

They also come from different issuers: Canary and Calamos. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for SUIS and 0.69% for CBXJ.