PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SUBFX vs. HRCPX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SUBFX achieves a 0.79% return, which is significantly lower than HRCPX's 11.31% return. Over the past 10 years, SUBFX has underperformed HRCPX with an annualized return of 3.93%, while HRCPX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.85% annualized return.


SUBFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.03%
YTD
0.79%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
3.93%

HRCPX

1D
-0.39%
1M
6.57%
YTD
11.31%
6M
11.54%
1Y
33.82%
3Y*
28.69%
5Y*
17.06%
10Y*
17.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
0.79%10.61%4.22%8.53%-4.74%-0.32%11.18%6.52%0.53%2.04%
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
11.31%23.00%35.17%39.55%-29.18%30.55%28.89%31.50%-7.37%31.43%

Correlation

The correlation between SUBFX and HRCPX is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2011

0.24

The correlation between SUBFX and HRCPX shifts across timeframes, from 0.18 (10 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SUBFX vs. HRCPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUBFX
SUBFX Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
SUBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SUBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
SUBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
SUBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SUBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

HRCPX
HRCPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
HRCPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HRCPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
HRCPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
HRCPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
HRCPX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) and Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SUBFXHRCPXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.59

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.16

9.67

+0.49

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SUBFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the HRCPX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SUBFX and HRCPX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


SUBFXHRCPXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.80

2.24

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.80

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

0.84

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.60

+0.34

Drawdowns

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUBFX drawdown since its inception was -11.22%, smaller than the maximum HRCPX drawdown of -56.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUBFX and HRCPX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SUBFXHRCPXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-56.83%

+45.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.34%

-13.43%

+11.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.88%

-23.28%

+18.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.17%

-31.75%

+20.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.22%

-31.85%

+20.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-0.39%

-0.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.46%

-9.16%

+7.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.60%

3.59%

-2.99%

Volatility

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund (SUBFX) is 1.51%, while Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund (HRCPX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that SUBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HRCPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SUBFXHRCPXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

3.59%

-2.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.78%

11.63%

-8.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.42%

15.59%

-12.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.49%

21.43%

-15.94%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.29%

21.20%

-15.91%

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUBFX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than HRCPX's 1.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

SUBFX vs. HRCPX - Dividend Comparison

SUBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.06%, more than HRCPX's 3.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HRCPX
Carillon ClariVest Capital Appreciation Fund
3.70%4.11%12.74%11.75%21.31%6.96%15.23%1.57%10.41%6.44%6.36%15.16%
SUBFX
Carillon Reams Unconstrained Bond Fund
6.06%6.44%4.92%4.52%2.16%1.96%3.01%2.83%2.06%1.17%1.01%0.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


SUBFX and HRCPX have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HRCPX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to SUBFX (1.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUBFX dropped -11.22% vs HRCPX's -56.83%.

HRCPX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SUBFX and HRCPX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer