SUB vs. IBMM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM).

SUB and IBMM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. SUB is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 5, 2008. IBMM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the S&P AMT-Free Municipal Series Dec 2024 Index. It was launched on Mar 20, 2018. Both SUB and IBMM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

SUB vs. IBMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

SUB vs. IBMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF	-0.43%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%

Returns By Period

SUB

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 1.01%
• 1Y: 3.37%
• 3Y*: 2.75%
• 5Y*: 1.39%
• 10Y*: 1.46%

IBMM

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SUB vs. IBMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

SUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IBMM's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

IBMM

iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF

SUB

iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF

Return for Risk

SUB vs. IBMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SUB

SUB Risk / Return Rank: 92
SUB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
SUB Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
SUB Omega Ratio Rank: 97
SUB Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
SUB Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SUB vs. IBMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF (IBMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	SUB	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.25	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.71	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.61	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.82	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.30	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	SUB	IBMM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.25	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.42	—	—

Dividends

SUB vs. IBMM - Dividend Comparison

SUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.47%, while IBMM has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF	2.27%	2.42%	2.10%	1.73%	0.86%	0.72%	1.23%	1.58%	1.32%	0.95%	0.75%	0.77%
IBMM iShares iBonds Dec 2024 Term Muni Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

SUB vs. IBMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SUB drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, which is greater than IBMM's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUB and IBMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	SUB	IBMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.46%	0.00%	-9.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.23%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-4.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-9.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.66%	0.00%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.92%	0.00%	-0.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SUB	IBMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.53%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.80%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.51%	0.00%	+1.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	1.64%	0.00%	+1.64%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2.59%	0.00%	+2.59%