SUB vs. CALI
SUB (iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF) and CALI (iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from iShares - SUB tracks the ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross while CALI tracks the ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, SUB returned 2.93% vs 2.86% for CALI. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SUB charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for CALI.
Performance
SUB vs. CALI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SUB achieves a 0.93% return, which is significantly lower than CALI's 1.03% return.
SUB
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 0.93%
- 6M
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 2.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 1.51%
- 10Y*
- 1.46%
CALI
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 2.86%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SUB vs. CALI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 0.93% | 3.64% | 2.17% | 2.28% |
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 1.03% | 3.28% | 2.84% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between SUB and CALI is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2023 | 0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SUB vs. CALI — Risk / Return Rank
SUB
CALI
SUB vs. CALI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) and iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SUB | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.91 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.90 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 4.29 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.32 | 21.89 | -11.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SUB vs. CALI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SUB drawdown since its inception was -9.46%, which is greater than CALI's maximum drawdown of -0.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SUB and CALI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SUB | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.46% | -0.78% | -8.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.81% | -0.67% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -4.35% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.01% | +0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.91% | -0.08% | -0.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.13% | +0.15% |
Volatility
SUB vs. CALI - Volatility Comparison
iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF (SUB) has a higher volatility of 0.25% compared to iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF (CALI) at 0.19%. This indicates that SUB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CALI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SUB | CALI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.25% | 0.19% | +0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 0.52% | +0.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01% | 0.75% | +0.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.64% | 1.10% | +0.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.60% | 1.10% | +1.50% |
SUB vs. CALI - Expense Ratio Comparison
SUB has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than CALI's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SUB vs. CALI - Dividend Comparison
SUB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, which matches CALI's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CALI iShares Short-Term California Muni Active ETF | 2.52% | 2.62% | 3.14% | 1.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SUB iShares Short-Term National Muni Bond ETF | 2.52% | 2.42% | 2.10% | 1.73% | 0.86% | 0.72% | 1.23% | 1.58% | 1.32% | 0.95% | 0.75% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SUB and CALI have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SUB has higher volatility (0.25%) compared to CALI (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SUB dropped -9.46% vs CALI's -0.78%.
On 1-year performance, SUB leads with 2.93% vs 2.86% for CALI. On fees, SUB is cheaper at 0.07% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, SUB has performed better with a 2.93% return vs 2.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SUB is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for CALI.
SUB and CALI have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.52%.
SUB tracks ICE Short Maturity AMT-Free US National Municipal Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while CALI tracks ICE AMT-Free California Municipal Index. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for SUB and 0.08% for CALI.
CALI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs 2.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SUB and CALI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer