SU.TO vs. CLF.TO
SU.TO (Suncor Energy Inc.) is a stock, while CLF.TO (iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF) is Canadian Government Bonds fund tracking the Morningstar Can 1-5Y Core Bd GR CAD. Over the past 10 years, SU.TO returned 13.61%/yr vs 1.60%/yr for CLF.TO. At a correlation of -0.14, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SU.TO achieves a 45.88% return, which is significantly higher than CLF.TO's 0.96% return. Over the past 10 years, SU.TO has outperformed CLF.TO with an annualized return of 13.61%, while CLF.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 1.60% annualized return.
SU.TO
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 11.86%
- 6M
- 27.99%
- YTD
- 45.88%
- 1Y
- 70.08%
- 3Y*
- 36.50%
- 5Y*
- 32.60%
- 10Y*
- 13.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.31%
CLF.TO
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -0.15%
- 6M
- 0.67%
- YTD
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 3.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.71%
- 10Y*
- 1.60%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.32%
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SU.TO Suncor Energy Inc. | 45.88% | 23.85% | 26.14% | 3.73% | 41.63% | 53.98% | -47.70% | 16.23% | -14.82% | 8.41% |
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 0.96% | 3.36% | 4.82% | 4.58% | -3.98% | -1.27% | 4.82% | 2.47% | 1.68% | -0.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between SU.TO and CLF.TO is -0.29, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.29 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2008 | -0.14 |
The correlation between SU.TO and CLF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.29 (1 year) to -0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
SU.TO
CLF.TO
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) and iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SU.TO | CLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.29 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.55 | 2.25 | +1.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.56 | 6.64 | +4.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SU.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, which is greater than CLF.TO's maximum drawdown of -6.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SU.TO and CLF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SU.TO | CLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.94% | -6.91% | -67.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.84% | -1.35% | -18.49% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.73% | -1.40% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.62% | -6.80% | -23.82% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -70.77% | -6.91% | -63.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.95% | -0.34% | -7.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.44% | -1.07% | -31.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.08% | 0.46% | +5.62% |
Volatility
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Volatility Comparison
Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.03% compared to iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF (CLF.TO) at 0.48%. This indicates that SU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SU.TO | CLF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.03% | 0.48% | +7.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.80% | 1.53% | +19.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.09% | 2.02% | +23.07% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.63% | 2.99% | +27.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 34.93% | 3.36% | +31.57% |
Dividends
SU.TO vs. CLF.TO - Dividend Comparison
SU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than CLF.TO's 2.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLF.TO iShares 1-5 Year Laddered Government Bond Index ETF | 2.26% | 2.22% | 2.22% | 2.23% | 2.10% | 1.98% | 2.15% | 2.46% | 2.67% | 2.91% | 3.12% | 3.29% |
SU.TO Suncor Energy Inc. | 2.71% | 3.79% | 4.30% | 4.96% | 4.38% | 3.32% | 5.13% | 3.95% | 3.78% | 2.77% | 2.64% | 3.19% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SU.TO and CLF.TO have a correlation of -0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for SU.TO and CLF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer