PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
SU.TO vs. EMA.TO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


SU.TOEMA.TO
YTD Return37.11%4.89%
1Y Return28.71%9.14%
3Y Return (Ann)24.85%-0.24%
5Y Return (Ann)9.28%3.47%
10Y Return (Ann)6.92%7.71%
Sharpe Ratio1.090.53
Sortino Ratio1.610.84
Omega Ratio1.201.11
Calmar Ratio1.350.39
Martin Ratio4.871.68
Ulcer Index5.68%5.31%
Daily Std Dev25.30%16.83%
Max Drawdown-73.94%-35.98%
Current Drawdown0.00%-11.63%

Fundamentals


SU.TOEMA.TO
Market CapCA$67.51BCA$14.76B
EPSCA$5.82CA$2.57
PE Ratio9.1319.61
PEG Ratio3.256.20
Total Revenue (TTM)CA$39.00BCA$5.33B
Gross Profit (TTM)CA$17.30BCA$1.18B
EBITDA (TTM)CA$11.89BCA$1.71B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.3

The correlation between SU.TO and EMA.TO is 0.28, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, SU.TO achieves a 37.11% return, which is significantly higher than EMA.TO's 4.89% return. Over the past 10 years, SU.TO has underperformed EMA.TO with an annualized return of 6.92%, while EMA.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 7.71% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-10.00%-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.19%
-1.18%
SU.TO
EMA.TO

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) and Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


SU.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for SU.TO, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.92
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for SU.TO, currently valued at 1.38, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.38
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for SU.TO, currently valued at 1.18, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.18
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for SU.TO, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.58
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for SU.TO, currently valued at 4.46, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.004.46
EMA.TO
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for EMA.TO, currently valued at 0.33, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.000.33
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for EMA.TO, currently valued at 0.58, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.000.58
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for EMA.TO, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.07
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for EMA.TO, currently valued at 0.21, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for EMA.TO, currently valued at 0.92, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.000.92

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SU.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is higher than the EMA.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SU.TO and EMA.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.001.502.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
0.92
0.33
SU.TO
EMA.TO

Dividends

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Dividend Comparison

SU.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.83%, less than EMA.TO's 4.27% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
SU.TO
Suncor Energy Inc.
3.83%4.95%4.37%3.32%5.14%3.95%3.78%3.62%2.65%3.17%2.74%1.97%
EMA.TO
Emera Incorporated
4.27%5.54%5.17%4.07%4.57%4.26%5.22%4.54%4.40%3.85%3.82%4.62%

Drawdowns

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SU.TO drawdown since its inception was -73.94%, which is greater than EMA.TO's maximum drawdown of -35.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SU.TO and EMA.TO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-30.00%-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-18.72%
-20.90%
SU.TO
EMA.TO

Volatility

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Volatility Comparison

Suncor Energy Inc. (SU.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.43% compared to Emera Incorporated (EMA.TO) at 5.44%. This indicates that SU.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMA.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
6.43%
5.44%
SU.TO
EMA.TO

Financials

SU.TO vs. EMA.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Suncor Energy Inc. and Emera Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in CAD except per share items