STYC.L vs. GBHY.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

STYC.L (PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc) and GBHY.L (Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist) are both High Yield Bonds funds - STYC.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD while GBHY.L tracks the Bloomberg MSCI Global High Yield Liquid Corporate Climate Transition ESG Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STYC.L returned 8.74%/yr vs 8.72%/yr for GBHY.L. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STYC.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GBHY.L.

Performance

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STYC.L achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly higher than GBHY.L's 1.15% return.

STYC.L

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.42%
• YTD: 1.41%
• 6M: 1.99%
• 1Y: 7.22%
• 3Y*: 8.74%
• 5Y*: 5.21%
• 10Y*: 5.50%

GBHY.L

• 1D: 0.25%
• 1M: 0.30%
• YTD: 1.15%
• 6M: 1.97%
• 1Y: 6.35%
• 3Y*: 8.72%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc	1.41%	9.13%	8.08%	8.74%
GBHY.L Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist	1.15%	10.42%	5.93%	7.76%

Correlation

The correlation between STYC.L and GBHY.L is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.61
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.70
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2023	0.73

The correlation between STYC.L and GBHY.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.61 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STYC.L

STYC.L Risk / Return Rank: 75
STYC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
STYC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
STYC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 72
STYC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
STYC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

GBHY.L

GBHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 43
GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
GBHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
GBHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 42
GBHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
GBHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STYC.L	GBHY.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.37	+0.75
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	2.16	+1.08
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	1.26	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.27	1.91	+2.36
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.96	7.59	+9.38
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STYC.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is higher than the GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STYC.L and GBHY.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STYC.L	GBHY.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.13	1.37	+0.75
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.76	1.32	-0.56

Drawdowns

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STYC.L drawdown since its inception was -21.57%, which is greater than GBHY.L's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STYC.L and GBHY.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	STYC.L	GBHY.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-21.57%	-5.09%	-16.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.68%	-3.31%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.94%	-4.17%	-1.77%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-9.62%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.57%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.02%	-0.37%	+0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.67%	-0.93%	-0.74%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.42%	0.84%	-0.42%

Volatility

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Volatility Comparison

PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc (STYC.L) and Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) have volatilities of 1.41% and 1.47%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STYC.L	GBHY.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.47%	-0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.69%	3.54%	-0.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.39%	4.61%	-1.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.70%	5.66%	+0.04%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.49%	5.66%	+0.83%

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

STYC.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than GBHY.L's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

STYC.L vs. GBHY.L - Dividend Comparison

STYC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GBHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.52%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
GBHY.L Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist	6.52%	6.49%	6.89%	5.78%
STYC.L PIMCO US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond Index UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STYC.L and GBHY.L in my portfolio?

STYC.L and GBHY.L have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STYC.L or GBHY.L?

On fees, GBHY.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STYC.L or GBHY.L?

GBHY.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for STYC.L.

What is the main difference between STYC.L and GBHY.L?

STYC.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD, while GBHY.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI Global High Yield Liquid Corporate Climate Transition ESG Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for STYC.L and 0.25% for GBHY.L.