PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GBHY.L achieves a -0.79% return, which is significantly higher than HYFC.L's -1.65% return.


GBHY.L

1D
1.11%
1M
-0.84%
YTD
-0.79%
6M
0.53%
1Y
7.48%
3Y*
7.93%
5Y*
10Y*

HYFC.L

1D
1.20%
1M
-1.81%
YTD
-1.65%
6M
-0.60%
1Y
5.63%
3Y*
7.05%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

GBHY.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HYFC.L's 0.45% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GBHY.L
GBHY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBHY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

HYFC.L
HYFC.L Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
HYFC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HYFC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
HYFC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
HYFC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
HYFC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GBHY.LHYFC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

0.89

+0.59

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.18

1.24

+0.94

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.19

+0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

0.93

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.83

3.62

+5.21

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GBHY.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is higher than the HYFC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GBHY.L and HYFC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GBHY.LHYFC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

0.89

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

0.77

+0.50

Correlation

The correlation between GBHY.L and HYFC.L is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Dividend Comparison

GBHY.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.65%, while HYFC.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Drawdowns

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GBHY.L drawdown since its inception was -5.09%, smaller than the maximum HYFC.L drawdown of -8.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GBHY.L and HYFC.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GBHY.LHYFC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.09%

-8.42%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.31%

-5.95%

+2.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.81%

-4.28%

+2.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.95%

-1.64%

+0.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

1.53%

-0.71%

Volatility

GBHY.L vs. HYFC.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global High Yield Corporate Bond ESG Climate Transition UCITS ETF Dist (GBHY.L) and Invesco US High Yield Fallen Angels UCITS ETF Acc (HYFC.L) have volatilities of 2.18% and 2.23%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GBHY.LHYFC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.18%

2.23%

-0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.12%

4.52%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.05%

6.30%

-1.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.64%

6.92%

-1.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.64%

6.92%

-1.28%