STXV vs. KEAT
STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and KEAT (Keating Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while KEAT is a Global Allocation fund actively managed by Keating. STXV is passively managed, while KEAT is actively managed. Over the past year, STXV returned 27.20% vs 24.92% for KEAT. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for KEAT.
Performance
STXV vs. KEAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than KEAT's 9.05% return.
STXV
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 3.00%
- YTD
- 12.50%
- 6M
- 13.79%
- 1Y
- 27.20%
- 3Y*
- 18.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KEAT
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- -1.47%
- YTD
- 9.05%
- 6M
- 9.91%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STXV vs. KEAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 12.50% | 16.26% | 4.30% |
KEAT Keating Active ETF | 9.05% | 22.76% | 2.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXV and KEAT is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 28, 2024 | 0.61 |
The correlation between STXV and KEAT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
STXV vs. KEAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
STXV
KEAT
Financial Services
Healthcare
Technology
-
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Industrials
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Communication Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Financial Services
STXV
KEAT
Healthcare
STXV
KEAT
Technology
STXV
KEAT
-
Energy
STXV
KEAT
Consumer Defensive
STXV
KEAT
Industrials
STXV
KEAT
Utilities
STXV
KEAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
STXV
KEAT
-
Communication Services
STXV
KEAT
Real Estate
STXV
KEAT
Basic Materials
STXV
KEAT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXV vs. KEAT — Risk / Return Rank
STXV
KEAT
STXV vs. KEAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and Keating Active ETF (KEAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STXV | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.27 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.44 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.70 | 4.14 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.14 | 11.38 | +5.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STXV | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.71 | 2.44 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 1.52 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
STXV vs. KEAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, which is greater than KEAT's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and KEAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXV | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -7.45% | -7.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -6.04% | +0.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -5.92% | +5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.75% | -1.57% | -1.18% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 2.20% | -0.61% |
Volatility
STXV vs. KEAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.03%, while Keating Active ETF (KEAT) has a volatility of 2.55%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXV | KEAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.03% | 2.55% | -0.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.03% | 8.32% | -1.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.08% | 10.25% | -0.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 10.27% | +2.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.22% | 10.27% | +2.95% |
STXV vs. KEAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than KEAT's 0.85% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXV vs. KEAT - Dividend Comparison
STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, which matches KEAT's 2.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KEAT Keating Active ETF | 2.25% | 2.48% | 1.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 2.24% | 2.37% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 0.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXV and KEAT have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEAT has higher volatility (2.55%) compared to STXV (2.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs KEAT's -7.45%.
On 1-year performance, STXV leads with 27.20% vs 24.92% for KEAT. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, STXV has performed better with a 27.20% return vs 24.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for KEAT.
STXV and KEAT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.24%.
STXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while KEAT is Global Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Strive and Keating. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.85% for KEAT.
STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXV and KEAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer