STXV vs. FUNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and FUNL (CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. STXV is passively managed, while FUNL is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 18.06%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for FUNL. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FUNL.

Performance

STXV vs. FUNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 12.50% return, which is significantly higher than FUNL's 5.66% return.

STXV

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 3.00%
• YTD: 12.50%
• 6M: 13.79%
• 1Y: 27.20%
• 3Y*: 18.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FUNL

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 7.22%
• 1Y: 18.97%
• 3Y*: 16.53%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXV vs. FUNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	12.50%	16.26%	13.34%	9.28%	-1.46%
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	5.66%	14.62%	15.55%	14.33%	-1.46%

Correlation

The correlation between STXV and FUNL is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.79
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2022	0.89

The correlation between STXV and FUNL shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

STXV vs. FUNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	STXV	FUNL
Financial Services	21.1%	19.3%
Healthcare	16.5%	15.3%
Technology	12.8%	14.6%
Energy	11.2%	7.6%
Consumer Defensive	7.9%	7.0%
Industrials	7.7%	11.5%
Utilities	6.2%	5.0%
Consumer Cyclical	5.8%	6.5%
Communication Services	4.5%	5.8%
Real Estate	3.4%	4.5%
Basic Materials	3.1%	2.2%

Return for Risk

STXV vs. FUNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXV

STXV Risk / Return Rank: 84
STXV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
STXV Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
STXV Omega Ratio Rank: 81
STXV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
STXV Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FUNL

FUNL Risk / Return Rank: 80
FUNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
FUNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
FUNL Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FUNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FUNL Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXV vs. FUNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXV	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.71	2.19	+0.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.86	3.26	+0.60
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.47	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.70	5.01	-0.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.14	23.31	-6.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXV vs. FUNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXV Sharpe Ratio is 2.71, which is comparable to the FUNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXV and FUNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXV	FUNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.71	2.19	+0.53
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.63	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.07	0.95	+0.12

Drawdowns

STXV vs. FUNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum FUNL drawdown of -19.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and FUNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXV	FUNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.80%	-19.35%	+4.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-3.83%	-1.98%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.80%	-17.37%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.12%	-0.12%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.75%	-3.54%	+0.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.59%	0.82%	+0.77%

Volatility

STXV vs. FUNL - Volatility Comparison

Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) has a higher volatility of 2.03% compared to CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL (FUNL) at 0.00%. This indicates that STXV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FUNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXV	FUNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.03%	0.00%	+2.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.03%	5.24%	+1.79%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.08%	8.82%	+1.26%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.22%	15.16%	-1.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.22%	15.29%	-2.07%

STXV vs. FUNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FUNL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXV vs. FUNL - Dividend Comparison

STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.24%, which matches FUNL's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FUNL CornerCap Fundametrics Large-Cap ETF FUNL	2.25%	2.10%	1.78%	1.69%	1.84%	1.55%	0.45%
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF	2.24%	2.37%	2.36%	2.05%	0.47%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXV and FUNL in my portfolio?

STXV and FUNL have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXV or FUNL?

STXV has higher volatility (2.03%) compared to FUNL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs FUNL's -19.35%.

Which ETF is better, STXV or FUNL?

On 3-year performance, STXV leads with 18.06% vs 16.53% for FUNL. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FUNL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXV or FUNL?

Over the 3-year period, STXV has performed better with a 18.06% return vs 16.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXV or FUNL?

STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for FUNL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXV or FUNL?

STXV and FUNL have nearly identical dividend yields, around 2.24%.

What is the main difference between STXV and FUNL?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and CornerCap. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.50% for FUNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.