STXV vs. COMT
STXV (Strive 1000 Value ETF) and COMT (iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while COMT is a Commodities fund tracking the S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STXV returned 17.56%/yr vs 12.71%/yr for COMT. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STXV charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.48%/yr for COMT.
Performance
STXV vs. COMT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STXV achieves a 16.15% return, which is significantly lower than COMT's 30.19% return.
STXV
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 11.37%
- YTD
- 16.15%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.56%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
COMT
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 2.53%
- 6M
- 26.18%
- YTD
- 30.19%
- 1Y
- 33.20%
- 3Y*
- 12.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 8.33%
STXV vs. COMT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 16.15% | 16.26% | 13.34% | 9.28% | -0.08% |
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 30.19% | 6.07% | 5.96% | -6.56% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between STXV and COMT is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2022 | 0.18 |
The correlation between STXV and COMT shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STXV vs. COMT — Risk / Return Rank
STXV
COMT
STXV vs. COMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) and iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STXV | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.27 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.71 | 1.90 | +2.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.19 | 6.35 | +10.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STXV vs. COMT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STXV drawdown since its inception was -14.80%, smaller than the maximum COMT drawdown of -51.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXV and COMT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STXV | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.80% | -51.89% | +37.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.81% | -17.57% | +11.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.80% | -17.57% | +2.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.22% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -11.28% | +11.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -23.95% | +21.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 5.24% | -3.65% |
Volatility
STXV vs. COMT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Strive 1000 Value ETF (STXV) is 2.63%, while iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF (COMT) has a volatility of 5.91%. This indicates that STXV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COMT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STXV | COMT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.63% | 5.91% | -3.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.96% | 19.67% | -12.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.96% | 21.54% | -11.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 21.20% | -8.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.13% | 18.85% | -5.72% |
STXV vs. COMT - Expense Ratio Comparison
STXV has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than COMT's 0.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
STXV vs. COMT - Dividend Comparison
STXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than COMT's 5.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COMT iShares GSCI Commodity Dynamic Roll Strategy ETF | 5.95% | 7.74% | 4.90% | 5.19% | 29.79% | 17.79% | 0.36% | 2.61% | 11.65% | 5.16% | 0.52% | 1.44% |
STXV Strive 1000 Value ETF | 2.06% | 2.37% | 2.36% | 2.05% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STXV and COMT have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
COMT has higher volatility (5.91%) compared to STXV (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXV dropped -14.80% vs COMT's -51.89%.
On 3-year performance, STXV leads with 17.56% vs 12.71% for COMT. On fees, STXV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, STXV has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, STXV has performed better with a 17.56% return vs 12.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STXV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for COMT.
COMT has the higher dividend yield at 5.95%, compared with 2.06% for STXV.
STXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while COMT is Commodities. STXV tracks Bloomberg US 1000 Value, while COMT tracks S&P GSCI Dynamic Roll (USD) Total Return Index. They also come from different issuers: Strive and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for STXV and 0.48% for COMT.
STXV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STXV and COMT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer