STXT vs. ZHOG

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

STXT (Strive Total Return Bond ETF) and ZHOG (F/m Opportunistic Income ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. STXT is passively managed, while ZHOG is actively managed. Over the past year, STXT returned 4.34% vs 5.65% for ZHOG. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STXT charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.43%/yr for ZHOG.

Performance

STXT vs. ZHOG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXT achieves a 0.19% return, which is significantly lower than ZHOG's 0.82% return.

STXT

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: -0.35%
• YTD: 0.19%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.34%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZHOG

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.82%
• 6M: 1.22%
• 1Y: 5.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXT vs. ZHOG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	0.19%	6.58%	1.77%	4.65%
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	0.82%	5.98%	4.94%	5.92%

Correlation

The correlation between STXT and ZHOG is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 7, 2023	0.75

The correlation between STXT and ZHOG shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.75 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

STXT vs. ZHOG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXT

STXT Risk / Return Rank: 30
STXT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
STXT Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
STXT Omega Ratio Rank: 30
STXT Calmar Ratio Rank: 29
STXT Martin Ratio Rank: 30

ZHOG

ZHOG Risk / Return Rank: 90
ZHOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
ZHOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZHOG Omega Ratio Rank: 95
ZHOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
ZHOG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXT vs. ZHOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) and F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	STXT	ZHOG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.13	3.58	-2.45
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.66	5.64	-3.98
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.74	-0.54
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.43	4.27	-2.84
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.35	18.51	-14.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

STXT vs. ZHOG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXT Sharpe Ratio is 1.13, which is lower than the ZHOG Sharpe Ratio of 3.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXT and ZHOG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	STXT	ZHOG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.13	3.58	-2.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.89	1.63	-0.73

Drawdowns

STXT vs. ZHOG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXT drawdown since its inception was -5.27%, which is greater than ZHOG's maximum drawdown of -3.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXT and ZHOG.

Drawdown Indicators

	STXT	ZHOG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-3.66%	-1.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.80%	-1.31%	-1.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.66%	-0.03%	-1.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.36%	-0.70%	-0.66%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.92%	0.30%	+0.62%

Volatility

STXT vs. ZHOG - Volatility Comparison

Strive Total Return Bond ETF (STXT) has a higher volatility of 1.49% compared to F/m Opportunistic Income ETF (ZHOG) at 0.44%. This indicates that STXT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZHOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STXT	ZHOG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.49%	0.44%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.82%	1.14%	+1.68%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87%	1.59%	+2.28%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.04%	4.01%	+1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.04%	4.01%	+1.03%

STXT vs. ZHOG - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXT has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than ZHOG's 0.43% expense ratio.

Dividends

STXT vs. ZHOG - Dividend Comparison

STXT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than ZHOG's 5.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
STXT Strive Total Return Bond ETF	4.70%	4.93%	5.15%	1.82%
ZHOG F/m Opportunistic Income ETF	5.11%	5.35%	5.50%	1.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STXT and ZHOG in my portfolio?

STXT and ZHOG have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, STXT or ZHOG?

STXT has higher volatility (1.49%) compared to ZHOG (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXT dropped -5.27% vs ZHOG's -3.66%.

Which ETF is better, STXT or ZHOG?

On 1-year performance, ZHOG leads with 5.65% vs 4.34% for STXT. On fees, ZHOG is cheaper at 0.43% per year. On volatility, ZHOG has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, STXT or ZHOG?

Over the 1-year period, ZHOG has performed better with a 5.65% return vs 4.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, STXT or ZHOG?

ZHOG is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for STXT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STXT or ZHOG?

ZHOG has the higher dividend yield at 5.11%, compared with 4.70% for STXT.

What is the main difference between STXT and ZHOG?

They also come from different issuers: Strive and F/m Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for STXT and 0.43% for ZHOG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZHOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.58 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.