PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STXF vs. DRLL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STXF vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Strive 500 ETF (STXF) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STXF achieves a 8.95% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 27.53% return.


STXF

1D
0.50%
1M
0.11%
YTD
8.95%
6M
9.14%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
10Y*

DRLL

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
27.53%
6M
25.63%
1Y
33.68%
3Y*
13.09%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STXF vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
8.95%17.95%25.13%27.70%-2.98%
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
27.53%7.74%0.02%-1.84%5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between STXF and DRLL is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2022

0.25

The correlation between STXF and DRLL shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STXF vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STXF
STXF Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
STXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
STXF Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
STXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
STXF Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

DRLL
DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STXF vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Strive 500 ETF (STXF) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXFDRLLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.25

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.60

2.43

+0.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.44

6.52

+4.93

STXF vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STXF Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STXF and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STXF vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STXF drawdown since its inception was -19.00%, smaller than the maximum DRLL drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STXF and DRLL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXFDRLLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.00%

-23.73%

+4.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.29%

-13.93%

+4.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.00%

-23.73%

+4.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

-10.72%

+8.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.30%

-8.03%

+5.73%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.11%

5.18%

-3.07%

Volatility

STXF vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Strive 500 ETF (STXF) is 4.41%, while Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) has a volatility of 8.22%. This indicates that STXF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXFDRLLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.41%

8.22%

-3.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.02%

18.44%

-8.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

22.46%

-9.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.15%

23.78%

-7.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.15%

23.78%

-7.63%

STXF vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

STXF has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.


Dividends

STXF vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

STXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than DRLL's 2.40% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DRLL
Strive U.S. Energy ETF
2.40%2.99%3.00%3.01%1.18%
STXF
Strive 500 ETF
1.04%1.05%1.13%1.21%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


STXF and DRLL have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DRLL has higher volatility (8.22%) compared to STXF (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STXF dropped -19.00% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

On 3-year performance, STXF leads with 21.18% vs 13.09% for DRLL. On fees, STXF is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, STXF has been the lower-risk option at 4.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, STXF has performed better with a 21.18% return vs 13.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STXF is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for DRLL.

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.40%, compared with 1.04% for STXF.

STXF is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. STXF tracks Bloomberg US Large Cap Index, while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for STXF and 0.41% for DRLL.

STXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STXF and DRLL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer