PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STX vs. LHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STX vs. LHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Seagate Technology plc (STX) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STX achieves a 238.67% return, which is significantly higher than LHX's 5.64% return. Over the past 10 years, STX has outperformed LHX with an annualized return of 51.08%, while LHX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.45% annualized return.


STX

1D
7.25%
1M
13.91%
YTD
238.67%
6M
225.10%
1Y
648.03%
3Y*
149.80%
5Y*
62.01%
10Y*
51.08%

LHX

1D
-1.40%
1M
1.35%
YTD
5.64%
6M
8.07%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
19.98%
5Y*
8.77%
10Y*
16.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STX vs. LHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STX
Seagate Technology plc
238.67%225.26%4.06%69.12%-51.42%87.50%10.14%62.14%-2.90%16.67%
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
5.64%42.28%1.88%3.67%-0.48%14.98%-2.76%49.21%-3.38%40.80%

Correlation

The correlation between STX and LHX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.20

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2002

0.32

Over the past year, the correlation between STX and LHX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.32, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

STX:

$10.58

LHX:

$12.29

PE Ratio

STX:

87.99

LHX:

25.05

PEG Ratio

STX:

1.05

LHX:

12.84

PS Ratio

STX:

19.01

LHX:

1.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

STX:

$11.01B

LHX:

$22.48B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STX:

$4.57B

LHX:

$5.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

STX:

$2.59B

LHX:

$3.32B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STX vs. LHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STX
STX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
STX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
STX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
STX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
STX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

LHX
LHX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
LHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
LHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
LHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STX vs. LHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Seagate Technology plc (STX) and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STXLHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+9.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+4.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.81

1.18

+0.63

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

31.15

1.22

+29.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

90.13

3.16

+86.97

STX vs. LHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STX Sharpe Ratio is 10.19, which is higher than the LHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STX and LHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STX vs. LHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STX drawdown since its inception was -88.74%, which is greater than LHX's maximum drawdown of -69.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STX and LHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STXLHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-88.74%

-69.82%

-18.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.00%

-20.55%

-0.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.00%

-25.98%

-14.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.99%

-38.16%

-18.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.99%

-38.16%

-18.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.03%

-18.06%

+17.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.44%

-21.33%

-5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.24%

7.89%

-0.65%

Volatility

STX vs. LHX - Volatility Comparison

Seagate Technology plc (STX) has a higher volatility of 19.61% compared to L3Harris Technologies, Inc. (LHX) at 7.33%. This indicates that STX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STXLHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.61%

7.33%

+12.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.59%

19.85%

+30.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.18%

24.63%

+39.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.86%

23.95%

+20.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

42.27%

25.44%

+16.83%

Dividends

STX vs. LHX - Dividend Comparison

STX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.31%, less than LHX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LHX
L3Harris Technologies, Inc.
1.59%1.64%2.21%2.17%2.15%1.91%1.80%1.45%1.86%1.55%2.01%2.23%
STX
Seagate Technology plc
0.31%1.05%3.27%3.28%5.32%2.40%4.21%4.27%6.53%6.02%6.60%6.14%

Financials

STX vs. LHX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Seagate Technology plc and L3Harris Technologies, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20222023202420252026
3.11B
5.74B
(STX) Total Revenue
(LHX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STX vs. LHX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Seagate Technology plc and L3Harris Technologies, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
46.5%
24.4%
Portfolio components
STX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a gross profit of 1.45B and revenue of 3.11B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 46.5%.

LHX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.40B and revenue of 5.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.4%.

STX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported an operating income of 982.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.6%.

LHX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported an operating income of 652.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.4%.

STX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Seagate Technology plc reported a net income of 748.00M and revenue of 3.11B, resulting in a net margin of 24.0%.

LHX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, L3Harris Technologies, Inc. reported a net income of 512.00M and revenue of 5.74B, resulting in a net margin of 8.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STX and LHX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STX has higher volatility (19.61%) compared to LHX (7.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STX dropped -88.74% vs LHX's -69.82%.

STX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (10.19 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STX and LHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer