PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STWD vs. VTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STWD vs. VTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STWD achieves a -3.33% return, which is significantly lower than VTR's 2.80% return. Over the past 10 years, STWD has outperformed VTR with an annualized return of 7.63%, while VTR has yielded a comparatively lower 5.93% annualized return.


STWD

1D
-0.99%
1M
-6.00%
YTD
-3.33%
6M
-2.92%
1Y
-5.47%
3Y*
7.38%
5Y*
1.13%
10Y*
7.63%

VTR

1D
-1.36%
1M
-9.97%
YTD
2.80%
6M
0.04%
1Y
28.40%
3Y*
24.36%
5Y*
10.53%
10Y*
5.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STWD vs. VTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STWD
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
-3.33%4.91%-0.56%26.70%-17.33%35.88%-12.01%36.80%1.11%6.08%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.80%35.09%22.24%15.06%-8.53%7.73%-9.80%3.42%3.45%0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between STWD and VTR is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2009

0.43

Over the past year, the correlation between STWD and VTR has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

EPS

STWD:

$1.39

VTR:

$0.55

PE Ratio

STWD:

12.19

VTR:

143.40

PEG Ratio

STWD:

1.00

VTR:

4.10

PS Ratio

STWD:

2.16

VTR:

6.09

Total Revenue (TTM)

STWD:

$1.98B

VTR:

$6.13B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STWD:

$1.19B

VTR:

-$261.17M

EBITDA (TTM)

STWD:

$1.83B

VTR:

$2.45B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STWD vs. VTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STWD
STWD Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
STWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
STWD Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
STWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
STWD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

VTR
VTR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
VTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
VTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STWD vs. VTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) and Ventas, Inc. (VTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STWDVTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.88

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.96

1.30

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.38

2.28

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.65

9.70

-10.35

STWD vs. VTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STWD Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the VTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STWD and VTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STWDVTRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.33

1.55

-1.88

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

0.43

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.25

0.17

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.30

+0.05

Drawdowns

STWD vs. VTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STWD drawdown since its inception was -66.34%, smaller than the maximum VTR drawdown of -83.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STWD and VTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STWDVTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.34%

-83.38%

+17.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.53%

-12.52%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.66%

-19.35%

+2.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.65%

-41.80%

+12.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.34%

-76.92%

+10.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.67%

-12.52%

-0.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-18.20%

+10.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.47%

2.93%

+5.54%

Volatility

STWD vs. VTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Starwood Property Trust, Inc. (STWD) is 5.59%, while Ventas, Inc. (VTR) has a volatility of 6.27%. This indicates that STWD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STWDVTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.59%

6.27%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.21%

13.86%

-1.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.67%

18.47%

-1.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.29%

24.87%

-0.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.13%

34.73%

-4.60%

Dividends

STWD vs. VTR - Dividend Comparison

STWD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.34%, more than VTR's 2.48% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STWD
Starwood Property Trust, Inc.
11.34%10.66%10.13%9.13%10.47%7.90%9.95%7.72%9.74%8.99%8.75%9.34%
VTR
Ventas, Inc.
2.48%2.48%3.06%3.61%4.00%3.52%4.37%5.49%5.40%5.19%4.74%20.47%

Financials

STWD vs. VTR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Ventas, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B20222023202420252026
512.46M
1.66B
(STWD) Total Revenue
(VTR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

STWD vs. VTR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Starwood Property Trust, Inc. and Ventas, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%202220232024202520260
39.6%
Portfolio components
STWD - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 512.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

VTR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a gross profit of 655.41M and revenue of 1.66B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

STWD - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 512.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

VTR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported an operating income of 191.56M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.6%.

STWD - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Starwood Property Trust, Inc. reported a net income of 51.88M and revenue of 512.46M, resulting in a net margin of 10.1%.

VTR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ventas, Inc. reported a net income of 55.91M and revenue of 1.66B, resulting in a net margin of 3.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STWD and VTR have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTR has higher volatility (6.27%) compared to STWD (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STWD dropped -66.34% vs VTR's -83.38%.

VTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STWD and VTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer