PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STTIX vs. QQQX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STTIX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STTIX achieves a -0.12% return, which is significantly lower than QQQX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, STTIX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 1.69%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.43% annualized return.


STTIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-0.12%
6M
0.06%
1Y
3.25%
3Y*
3.68%
5Y*
0.21%
10Y*
1.69%

QQQX

1D
-2.09%
1M
-2.20%
YTD
7.43%
6M
7.82%
1Y
25.88%
3Y*
14.83%
5Y*
8.34%
10Y*
13.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STTIX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
-0.12%6.66%5.94%-1.89%-10.52%4.57%7.19%3.44%-6.48%4.90%
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
7.43%14.87%25.61%21.68%-27.39%25.32%15.75%28.83%-11.68%39.19%

Correlation

The correlation between STTIX and QQQX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.25

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STTIX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STTIX
STTIX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
STTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
STTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
STTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
STTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQX
QQQX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
QQQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQX Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STTIX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) and Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STTIXQQQXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.95

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.32

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.22

2.85

-1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.40

12.24

-8.84

STTIX vs. QQQX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STTIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the QQQX Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STTIX and QQQX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STTIX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STTIX drawdown since its inception was -18.71%, smaller than the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STTIX and QQQX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STTIXQQQXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.71%

-57.25%

+38.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-9.11%

+6.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.10%

-22.80%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.71%

-29.33%

+10.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.71%

-35.96%

+17.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.50%

-5.62%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-8.01%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.12%

-1.10%

Volatility

STTIX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund (STTIX) is 0.84%, while Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 6.07%. This indicates that STTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STTIXQQQXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

6.07%

-5.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.51%

12.46%

-9.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.56%

15.14%

-11.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.83%

19.94%

-10.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.81%

21.11%

-13.30%

STTIX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STTIX has a 1.38% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

STTIX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison

STTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.70%, less than QQQX's 8.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QQQX
Nuveen Nasdaq 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund
8.45%7.85%6.73%7.26%9.66%5.85%6.00%6.49%8.40%5.95%7.54%7.23%
STTIX
North SquareTrilogy Alternative Return Fund
4.70%4.26%17.39%2.10%1.03%0.49%1.02%1.68%1.73%0.96%0.99%1.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


STTIX and QQQX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQQX has higher volatility (6.07%) compared to STTIX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STTIX dropped -18.71% vs QQQX's -57.25%.

QQQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STTIX and QQQX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer