STSVX vs. TISBX
STSVX (BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund) and TISBX (TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, STSVX returned 10.25%/yr vs 11.61%/yr for TISBX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. STSVX charges 1.03%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for TISBX.
Performance
STSVX vs. TISBX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with STSVX having a 20.95% return and TISBX slightly lower at 20.55%. Over the past 10 years, STSVX has underperformed TISBX with an annualized return of 10.25%, while TISBX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.61% annualized return.
STSVX
- 1D
- -0.34%
- 1M
- 4.07%
- YTD
- 20.95%
- 6M
- 18.88%
- 1Y
- 29.67%
- 3Y*
- 14.44%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.25%
TISBX
- 1D
- -0.95%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 20.55%
- 6M
- 17.50%
- 1Y
- 39.33%
- 3Y*
- 19.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.48%
- 10Y*
- 11.61%
STSVX vs. TISBX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STSVX BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund | 20.95% | 8.27% | 5.04% | 6.86% | -9.05% | 24.73% | 4.21% | 24.54% | -8.69% | 10.60% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 20.55% | 12.72% | 11.60% | 17.07% | -20.31% | 14.85% | 20.14% | 25.61% | -10.99% | 13.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between STSVX and TISBX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2002 | 0.96 |
The correlation between STSVX and TISBX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STSVX vs. TISBX — Risk / Return Rank
STSVX
TISBX
STSVX vs. TISBX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) and TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STSVX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.34 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.30 | 3.79 | -0.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.34 | 13.39 | -3.05 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STSVX vs. TISBX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STSVX drawdown since its inception was -58.05%, roughly equal to the maximum TISBX drawdown of -56.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STSVX and TISBX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STSVX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.05% | -56.50% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.45% | -10.95% | +1.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.50% | -27.44% | -0.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.50% | -31.89% | +4.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.41% | -41.69% | -1.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.34% | -0.95% | +0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.84% | -9.66% | +0.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 3.09% | -0.08% |
Volatility
STSVX vs. TISBX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund (STSVX) is 5.18%, while TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund (TISBX) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that STSVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TISBX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STSVX | TISBX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.18% | 6.47% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.18% | 14.33% | -2.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.28% | 19.75% | -2.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.71% | 22.64% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.70% | 23.46% | -0.76% |
STSVX vs. TISBX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STSVX has a 1.03% expense ratio, which is higher than TISBX's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
STSVX vs. TISBX - Dividend Comparison
STSVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 31.50%, more than TISBX's 3.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STSVX BNY Mellon Small Cap Value Fund | 31.50% | 38.10% | 13.68% | 4.85% | 9.08% | 12.78% | 0.77% | 8.24% | 16.03% | 18.50% | 8.41% | 9.68% |
TISBX TIAA-CREF Small-Cap Blend Index Fund | 3.42% | 4.12% | 6.82% | 3.09% | 1.97% | 8.96% | 2.65% | 5.16% | 9.29% | 4.49% | 4.03% | 4.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, STSVX and TISBX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
TISBX has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to STSVX (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STSVX dropped -58.05% vs TISBX's -56.50%.
TISBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STSVX and TISBX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer