PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STSCX vs. BIBTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STSCX achieves a 16.33% return, which is significantly higher than BIBTX's 0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, STSCX has outperformed BIBTX with an annualized return of 12.04%, while BIBTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.04% annualized return.


STSCX

1D
-0.75%
1M
0.07%
YTD
16.33%
6M
17.25%
1Y
35.17%
3Y*
19.51%
5Y*
9.69%
10Y*
12.04%

BIBTX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.32%
6M
0.36%
1Y
5.33%
3Y*
4.16%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
2.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STSCX
Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund
16.33%11.87%13.78%19.04%-14.45%31.59%3.18%33.00%-14.38%13.19%
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
0.32%6.93%2.17%5.53%-13.24%-1.21%9.24%9.29%-0.34%4.34%

Correlation

The correlation between STSCX and BIBTX is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 1999

-0.15

The correlation between STSCX and BIBTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.15 (all time) to 0.22 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STSCX vs. BIBTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STSCX
STSCX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
STSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
STSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
STSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
STSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

BIBTX
BIBTX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
BIBTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIBTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIBTX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BIBTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIBTX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STSCXBIBTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.22

1.25

+0.97

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.28

1.88

+1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.22

+0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.64

1.83

+1.81

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.50

5.39

+8.11

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STSCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the BIBTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STSCX and BIBTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STSCXBIBTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.25

+0.97

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.03

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.42

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.94

-0.34

Drawdowns

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STSCX drawdown since its inception was -54.02%, which is greater than BIBTX's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STSCX and BIBTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STSCXBIBTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.02%

-18.28%

-35.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.33%

-3.05%

-6.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.48%

-6.33%

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.48%

-18.28%

-7.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.28%

-18.28%

-26.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-1.50%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.18%

-2.38%

-5.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.51%

1.03%

+1.48%

Volatility

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Volatility Comparison

Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund (STSCX) has a higher volatility of 3.87% compared to Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) at 1.35%. This indicates that STSCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STSCXBIBTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.87%

1.35%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.09%

2.87%

+8.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.61%

4.01%

+11.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.02%

5.81%

+14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.12%

4.89%

+17.23%

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STSCX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBTX's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

STSCX vs. BIBTX - Dividend Comparison

STSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.43%, more than BIBTX's 4.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BIBTX
Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund
4.26%4.09%4.11%3.17%2.82%3.15%4.03%3.12%3.22%3.00%3.27%3.55%
STSCX
Sterling Capital Stratton Small Cap Value Fund
17.43%20.28%23.71%39.14%27.85%23.34%16.67%13.04%9.11%9.20%5.09%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


STSCX and BIBTX have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STSCX has higher volatility (3.87%) compared to BIBTX (1.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STSCX dropped -54.02% vs BIBTX's -18.28%.

STSCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STSCX and BIBTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer