STRN vs. RMRC

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

STRN (SMART Trend ETF) and RMRC (ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF) are both Actively Managed funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.38 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STRN charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for RMRC.

Performance

STRN vs. RMRC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SMART Trend ETF (STRN) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

STRN

• 1D: -3.03%
• 1M: -6.46%
• 6M: 14.02%
• YTD: 19.31%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RMRC

• 1D: 0.74%
• 1M: 1.03%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRN vs. RMRC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
STRN SMART Trend ETF	16.31%
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	3.28%

Correlation

The correlation between STRN and RMRC is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2026	0.38

Return for Risk

STRN vs. RMRC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SMART Trend ETF (STRN) and ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF (RMRC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

STRN vs. RMRC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRN drawdown since its inception was -15.43%, which is greater than RMRC's maximum drawdown of -6.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRN and RMRC.

Drawdown Indicators

	STRN	RMRC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.43%	-6.57%	-8.86%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.89%	0.00%	-8.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.00%	-1.63%	-1.37%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	STRN	RMRC	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.85%	10.22%	+16.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.85%	10.22%	+16.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.85%	10.22%	+16.63%

STRN vs. RMRC - Expense Ratio Comparison

STRN has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than RMRC's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

STRN vs. RMRC - Dividend Comparison

STRN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than RMRC's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
RMRC ARMOR Core Risk-Managed ETF	0.58%	0.00%
STRN SMART Trend ETF	0.15%	0.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STRN and RMRC in my portfolio?

STRN and RMRC have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, STRN or RMRC?

On fees, STRN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, STRN or RMRC?

STRN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for RMRC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, STRN or RMRC?

RMRC has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.15% for STRN.

What is the main difference between STRN and RMRC?

They also come from different issuers: SmartWay and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for STRN and 0.60% for RMRC.