PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STRGX vs. FZFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STRGX achieves a 17.06% return, which is significantly lower than FZFLX's 33.04% return. Over the past 10 years, STRGX has underperformed FZFLX with an annualized return of 10.28%, while FZFLX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.07% annualized return.


STRGX

1D
1.28%
1M
0.19%
YTD
17.06%
6M
15.95%
1Y
25.14%
3Y*
15.49%
5Y*
7.27%
10Y*
10.28%

FZFLX

1D
1.53%
1M
6.05%
YTD
33.04%
6M
33.74%
1Y
48.52%
3Y*
24.40%
5Y*
12.03%
10Y*
14.07%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STRGX
Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund
17.06%5.40%9.49%14.39%-10.92%23.49%3.74%32.73%-14.28%21.75%
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
33.04%10.76%15.52%17.75%-15.62%20.40%19.78%31.96%-9.25%18.41%

Correlation

The correlation between STRGX and FZFLX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2015

0.93

The correlation between STRGX and FZFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STRGX vs. FZFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STRGX
STRGX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
STRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
STRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
STRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
STRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

FZFLX
FZFLX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FZFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FZFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) and Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STRGXFZFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.41

4.77

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.33

20.14

-9.81

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is comparable to the FZFLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STRGX and FZFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STRGXFZFLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.87

2.44

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.57

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.67

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.57

0.63

-0.06

Drawdowns

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STRGX drawdown since its inception was -53.50%, which is greater than FZFLX's maximum drawdown of -42.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STRGX and FZFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STRGXFZFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.50%

-42.03%

-11.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.79%

-10.68%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.88%

-22.29%

+1.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.22%

-24.77%

+3.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.35%

-42.03%

+0.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-0.33%

-1.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.03%

-5.74%

-2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.56%

2.52%

+0.04%

Volatility

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund (STRGX) is 4.11%, while Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund (FZFLX) has a volatility of 7.41%. This indicates that STRGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FZFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STRGXFZFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.11%

7.41%

-3.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.80%

17.71%

-6.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.22%

20.84%

-6.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

21.11%

-3.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.13%

21.11%

-1.98%

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STRGX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than FZFLX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

STRGX vs. FZFLX - Dividend Comparison

STRGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.57%, less than FZFLX's 43.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FZFLX
Fidelity SAI Small-Mid Cap 500 Index Fund
43.42%57.77%10.20%2.35%79.79%50.77%7.19%6.49%7.69%1.68%0.93%0.67%
STRGX
Sterling Capital Stratton Mid Cap Value Fund
8.57%10.04%15.16%12.43%17.98%8.18%0.84%5.40%9.91%3.79%0.60%3.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


STRGX and FZFLX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FZFLX has higher volatility (7.41%) compared to STRGX (4.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STRGX dropped -53.50% vs FZFLX's -42.03%.

FZFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 1.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STRGX and FZFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer