STPZ vs. SMMU
STPZ (PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF) and SMMU (PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STPZ is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the ICE BofA US Inflation-Linked Treasury (1-5 Y), while SMMU is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by PIMCO. STPZ is passively managed, while SMMU is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, STPZ returned 2.89%/yr vs 1.82%/yr for SMMU. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. STPZ charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMMU.
Performance
STPZ vs. SMMU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STPZ achieves a 1.79% return, which is significantly higher than SMMU's 1.10% return. Over the past 10 years, STPZ has outperformed SMMU with an annualized return of 2.89%, while SMMU has yielded a comparatively lower 1.82% annualized return.
STPZ
- 1D
- -0.00%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.79%
- 6M
- 1.77%
- 1Y
- 4.51%
- 3Y*
- 5.03%
- 5Y*
- 2.90%
- 10Y*
- 2.89%
SMMU
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 6M
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.92%
- 3Y*
- 3.67%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- 1.82%
STPZ vs. SMMU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 1.79% | 6.40% | 4.30% | 4.28% | -4.49% | 5.64% | 5.44% | 4.83% | 0.04% | 0.51% |
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 1.10% | 4.06% | 2.68% | 4.39% | -2.45% | 0.17% | 2.87% | 3.47% | 1.51% | 2.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between STPZ and SMMU is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2010 | 0.22 |
The correlation between STPZ and SMMU shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (all time) to 0.39 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STPZ vs. SMMU — Risk / Return Rank
STPZ
SMMU
STPZ vs. SMMU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) and PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STPZ | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.90 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.87 | 5.10 | -0.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.28 | 18.24 | -1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STPZ | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 3.84 | -1.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 | 1.14 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.67 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.90 | 0.60 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
STPZ vs. SMMU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STPZ drawdown since its inception was -6.77%, which is greater than SMMU's maximum drawdown of -5.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STPZ and SMMU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STPZ | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.77% | -5.09% | -1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.93% | -0.77% | -0.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -1.35% | -1.95% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.70% | -4.76% | -1.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -6.77% | -5.09% | -1.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.03% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.31% | -0.55% | -0.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.28% | 0.22% | +0.06% |
Volatility
STPZ vs. SMMU - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF (STPZ) has a higher volatility of 0.46% compared to PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF (SMMU) at 0.31%. This indicates that STPZ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STPZ | SMMU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.46% | 0.31% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.20% | 0.79% | +0.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.83% | 1.02% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.29% | 1.67% | +1.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.98% | 2.73% | +0.25% |
STPZ vs. SMMU - Expense Ratio Comparison
STPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMU's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
STPZ vs. SMMU - Dividend Comparison
STPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.10%, more than SMMU's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMU PIMCO Short Term Municipal Bond Active ETF | 2.84% | 2.80% | 3.03% | 2.79% | 1.37% | 0.60% | 1.19% | 1.82% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 1.03% | 0.89% |
STPZ PIMCO 1-5 Year US TIPS Index ETF | 4.10% | 3.65% | 1.97% | 1.63% | 5.88% | 3.65% | 1.86% | 1.76% | 2.23% | 1.51% | 0.65% | 0.49% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STPZ and SMMU have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STPZ has higher volatility (0.46%) compared to SMMU (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STPZ dropped -6.77% vs SMMU's -5.09%.
On 10-year performance, STPZ leads with 2.89% vs 1.82% for SMMU. On fees, STPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SMMU has been the lower-risk option at 0.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, STPZ has performed better with a 2.89% return vs 1.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
STPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for SMMU.
STPZ has the higher dividend yield at 4.10%, compared with 2.84% for SMMU.
STPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SMMU is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for STPZ and 0.35% for SMMU.
SMMU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.84 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STPZ and SMMU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer