STOT vs. LDUR
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR).
STOT and LDUR are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. STOT is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate 1-3 Year Index. It was launched on Apr 13, 2016. LDUR is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Jan 22, 2014.
Performance
STOT vs. LDUR - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STOT vs. LDUR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 0.35% | 5.56% | 5.26% | 6.39% | -3.75% | 0.27% | 2.43% | 4.40% | 0.95% | 1.71% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 0.43% | 5.76% | 5.14% | 4.78% | -4.23% | -0.55% | 4.49% | 4.27% | 1.05% | 2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STOT achieves a 0.35% return, which is significantly lower than LDUR's 0.43% return.
STOT
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- -0.43%
- YTD
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- 1Y
- 4.21%
- 3Y*
- 5.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
LDUR
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- YTD
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- 1Y
- 4.29%
- 3Y*
- 4.96%
- 5Y*
- 2.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.51%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STOT vs. LDUR - Expense Ratio Comparison
STOT has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than LDUR's 0.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STOT vs. LDUR — Risk / Return Rank
STOT
LDUR
STOT vs. LDUR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) and PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STOT | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.49 | 2.32 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.58 | 3.50 | +0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.58 | 1.46 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 3.69 | +1.88 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.75 | 17.57 | +1.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STOT | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.49 | 2.32 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.60 | 1.07 | +0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.10 | 0.86 | +0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between STOT and LDUR is 0.33, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STOT vs. LDUR - Dividend Comparison
STOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.42%, which matches LDUR's 4.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STOT State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF | 4.42% | 4.52% | 5.10% | 4.53% | 2.54% | 1.76% | 1.66% | 2.61% | 2.50% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 0.00% |
LDUR PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF | 4.43% | 4.60% | 4.77% | 4.11% | 2.22% | 0.90% | 2.15% | 3.14% | 2.66% | 2.08% | 1.85% | 2.92% |
Drawdowns
STOT vs. LDUR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STOT drawdown since its inception was -6.07%, smaller than the maximum LDUR drawdown of -8.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STOT and LDUR.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STOT | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.07% | -8.68% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.76% | -1.17% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.07% | -6.75% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -8.68% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.51% | -0.44% | -0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.85% | -0.86% | +0.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.23% | 0.25% | -0.02% |
Volatility
STOT vs. LDUR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street DoubleLine Short Duration Total Return Tactical ETF (STOT) is 0.48%, while PIMCO Enhanced Low Duration Active ETF (LDUR) has a volatility of 0.75%. This indicates that STOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LDUR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STOT | LDUR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.48% | 0.75% | -0.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.80% | 1.12% | -0.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70% | 1.86% | -0.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.73% | 2.02% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.21% | 2.79% | -0.58% |