STNFX vs. WFMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX).
STNFX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. WFMIX is managed by Allspring Global Investments.
Performance
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.19% | 14.63% | 30.44% | 40.91% | -30.86% | 15.76% | 32.30% | 47.33% | 1.22% | 33.40% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 0.81% | 6.14% | 11.95% | 9.54% | -4.65% | 28.53% | 3.27% | 40.27% | -13.12% | 11.16% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNFX achieves a -12.19% return, which is significantly lower than WFMIX's 0.81% return. Over the past 10 years, STNFX has outperformed WFMIX with an annualized return of 14.68%, while WFMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.19% annualized return.
STNFX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- -12.19%
- 6M
- -14.28%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
WFMIX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -8.75%
- YTD
- 0.81%
- 6M
- 1.39%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than WFMIX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STNFX vs. WFMIX — Risk / Return Rank
STNFX
WFMIX
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNFX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.92 | -0.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.12 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.72 | -0.31 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 2.55 | -1.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNFX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.56 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.45 | -0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.54 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.45 | +0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between STNFX and WFMIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Dividend Comparison
STNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.01%, more than WFMIX's 11.15% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | 16.01% | 14.06% | 14.18% | 18.68% | 10.88% | 15.11% | 13.51% | 19.01% | 30.81% | 22.67% | 5.50% | 5.97% |
WFMIX Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I | 11.15% | 11.24% | 8.00% | 5.51% | 8.71% | 9.87% | 0.66% | 7.48% | 2.74% | 4.41% | 1.44% | 4.47% |
Drawdowns
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNFX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum WFMIX drawdown of -52.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNFX and WFMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNFX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -52.70% | +9.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.69% | -11.57% | -6.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.46% | -22.13% | -21.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.46% | -43.80% | +0.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -8.99% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -7.53% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 3.27% | +2.43% |
Volatility
STNFX vs. WFMIX - Volatility Comparison
Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) has a higher volatility of 5.38% compared to Allspring Special Mid Cap Value Fund Class I (WFMIX) at 4.89%. This indicates that STNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WFMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STNFX | WFMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 4.89% | +0.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 10.28% | +1.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 17.39% | +4.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 17.15% | +6.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 18.86% | +4.06% |