STNFX vs. EKJAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX).
STNFX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jul 30, 2010. EKJAX is managed by Allspring Global Investments. It was launched on Jan 20, 1998.
Performance
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | -12.19% | 14.63% | 30.44% | 40.91% | -30.86% | 15.76% | 32.30% | 47.33% | 1.22% | 33.40% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | -13.16% | 16.28% | 36.91% | 33.14% | -33.88% | 13.07% | 39.03% | 45.22% | 1.13% | 34.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STNFX achieves a -12.19% return, which is significantly higher than EKJAX's -13.16% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with STNFX having a 14.68% annualized return and EKJAX not far behind at 14.16%.
STNFX
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -8.98%
- YTD
- -12.19%
- 6M
- -14.28%
- 1Y
- 10.16%
- 3Y*
- 18.00%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- 14.68%
EKJAX
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- -10.80%
- YTD
- -13.16%
- 6M
- -15.55%
- 1Y
- 12.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.22%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 14.16%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STNFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EKJAX's 1.11% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STNFX vs. EKJAX — Risk / Return Rank
STNFX
EKJAX
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STNFX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.83 | 0.91 | -0.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.13 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 0.54 | -0.13 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 1.81 | -0.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STNFX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 | 0.53 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 | 0.56 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.37 | +0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between STNFX and EKJAX is 0.98, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Dividend Comparison
STNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.01%, less than EKJAX's 37.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund | 16.01% | 14.06% | 14.18% | 18.68% | 10.88% | 15.11% | 13.51% | 19.01% | 30.81% | 22.67% | 5.50% | 5.97% |
EKJAX Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund | 37.32% | 32.41% | 20.46% | 40.04% | 0.00% | 27.04% | 12.00% | 16.22% | 21.24% | 28.36% | 11.30% | 7.21% |
Drawdowns
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STNFX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum EKJAX drawdown of -59.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNFX and EKJAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STNFX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.46% | -59.70% | +16.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.69% | -18.10% | +0.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.46% | -50.43% | +6.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.46% | -50.43% | +6.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.69% | -18.10% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.57% | -20.68% | +13.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.70% | 5.41% | +0.29% |
Volatility
STNFX vs. EKJAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) is 5.38%, while Allspring Premier Large Company Growth Fund (EKJAX) has a volatility of 6.72%. This indicates that STNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EKJAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STNFX | EKJAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.38% | 6.72% | -1.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.61% | 13.71% | -2.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.58% | 23.62% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.47% | 27.92% | -4.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.92% | 25.30% | -2.38% |