STNFX vs. EVSAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

STNFX (Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund) and EVSAX (Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund) are both mutual funds - STNFX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Allspring, while EVSAX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Allspring. Over the past 10 years, STNFX returned 15.84%/yr vs 14.85%/yr for EVSAX. Their correlation of 0.91 means they have usually moved in the same direction. STNFX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for EVSAX.

Performance

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STNFX achieves a 1.22% return, which is significantly lower than EVSAX's 9.91% return. Over the past 10 years, STNFX has outperformed EVSAX with an annualized return of 15.84%, while EVSAX has yielded a comparatively lower 14.85% annualized return.

STNFX

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: -0.98%
• 6M: 2.90%
• YTD: 1.22%
• 1Y: 4.09%
• 3Y*: 18.04%
• 5Y*: 8.64%
• 10Y*: 15.84%
• ALL TIME*: 14.16%

EVSAX

• 1D: 1.89%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 8.44%
• YTD: 9.91%
• 1Y: 21.90%
• 3Y*: 20.50%
• 5Y*: 13.73%
• 10Y*: 14.85%
• ALL TIME*: 9.03%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
EVSAX Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund	1.22%	14.63%	30.44%	40.91%	-30.86%	15.76%	32.30%	47.33%	1.22%	33.40%
EVSAX Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund	9.91%	18.65%	29.20%	25.97%	-18.21%	30.35%	15.95%	31.87%	-8.43%	20.47%

Correlation

The correlation between STNFX and EVSAX is 0.92, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.92
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.93
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.91

The correlation between STNFX and EVSAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

STNFX vs. EVSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

STNFX

STNFX Risk / Return Rank: 6
STNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
STNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6
STNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6
STNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
STNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 6

EVSAX

EVSAX Risk / Return Rank: 65
EVSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
EVSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
EVSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
EVSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
EVSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 80

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) and Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STNFX	EVSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.16	1.49	-1.33
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	2.08	-1.75
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.26	-0.22
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.15	2.28	-2.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.41	9.67	-9.25

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STNFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.16, which is lower than the EVSAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STNFX and EVSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STNFX drawdown since its inception was -43.46%, smaller than the maximum EVSAX drawdown of -53.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STNFX and EVSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	STNFX	EVSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.46%	-53.73%	+10.27%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.69%	-8.65%	-9.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.45%	-19.00%	-3.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.46%	-27.72%	-15.74%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.46%	-33.03%	-10.43%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.60%	-2.03%	-3.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-9.71%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.33%	2.04%	+4.29%

Volatility

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Volatility Comparison

Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund (STNFX) has a higher volatility of 5.13% compared to Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund (EVSAX) at 3.77%. This indicates that STNFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EVSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STNFX	EVSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.13%	3.77%	+1.36%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.02%	10.43%	+2.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.60%	13.30%	+3.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.61%	17.71%	+5.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.01%	18.41%	+4.60%

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STNFX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than EVSAX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

STNFX vs. EVSAX - Dividend Comparison

STNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.89%, more than EVSAX's 5.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EVSAX Allspring Disciplined U.S. Core Fund	5.04%	5.54%	6.61%	9.22%	14.46%	8.22%	9.22%	6.68%	7.11%	4.31%	2.43%	11.99%
STNFX Allspring Large Cap Growth Fund	13.89%	14.06%	14.18%	18.68%	10.88%	15.11%	13.51%	19.01%	30.81%	22.67%	5.50%	5.97%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STNFX and EVSAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, STNFX and EVSAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, STNFX or EVSAX?

STNFX has higher volatility (5.13%) compared to EVSAX (3.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STNFX dropped -43.46% vs EVSAX's -53.73%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EVSAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.