STN vs. TXRH
STN (Stantec Inc) and TXRH (Texas Roadhouse, Inc.) are both stocks. STN operates in Engineering & Construction (Industrials), while TXRH operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, STN returned 12.59%/yr vs 15.75%/yr for TXRH. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STN vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STN achieves a -23.15% return, which is significantly lower than TXRH's 2.00% return. Over the past 10 years, STN has underperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 12.59%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
STN
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- -7.28%
- YTD
- -23.15%
- 6M
- -22.43%
- 1Y
- -32.48%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 11.02%
- 10Y*
- 12.59%
TXRH
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -5.98%
- YTD
- 2.00%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- -8.56%
- 3Y*
- 16.67%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- 15.75%
STN vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN Stantec Inc | -23.15% | 21.08% | -1.44% | 68.90% | -13.76% | 75.67% | 16.56% | 31.83% | -20.43% | 12.80% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 2.00% | -6.57% | 49.78% | 37.15% | 4.16% | 15.71% | 39.83% | -3.62% | 15.11% | 11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between STN and TXRH is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
STN:
$8.24B
TXRH:
$11.10B
STN:
CA$3.98
TXRH:
$6.26
STN:
25.36
TXRH:
26.82
STN:
1.05
TXRH:
1.67
STN:
1.48
TXRH:
1.84
STN:
CA$7.77B
TXRH:
$6.06B
STN:
CA$3.11B
TXRH:
$1.14B
STN:
CA$1.05B
TXRH:
$701.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STN vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank
STN
TXRH
STN vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc (STN) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STN | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 0.97 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.88 | -0.44 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -2.00 | -0.76 | -1.24 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STN vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STN drawdown since its inception was -67.42%, smaller than the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN and TXRH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STN | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.42% | -76.59% | +9.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -36.93% | -19.61% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.93% | -24.82% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.93% | -30.45% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.93% | -58.04% | +21.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.11% | -15.97% | -20.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.12% | -16.15% | -0.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.27% | 11.33% | +4.94% |
Volatility
STN vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison
Stantec Inc (STN) has a higher volatility of 11.50% compared to Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) at 9.74%. This indicates that STN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STN | TXRH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.50% | 9.74% | +1.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.17% | 22.59% | +1.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.91% | 29.28% | -1.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.27% | 30.59% | -5.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.65% | 35.61% | -9.96% |
Dividends
STN vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison
STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.09%, less than TXRH's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN Stantec Inc | 1.09% | 0.69% | 0.78% | 0.79% | 1.14% | 1.17% | 1.42% | 1.55% | 1.91% | 1.79% | 1.78% | 1.69% |
TXRH Texas Roadhouse, Inc. | 1.70% | 1.64% | 1.35% | 1.80% | 2.02% | 1.34% | 0.46% | 2.13% | 1.68% | 1.59% | 1.58% | 1.90% |
Financials
STN vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STN vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison
STN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
TXRH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.
STN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
TXRH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.
STN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
TXRH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STN and TXRH have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
STN has higher volatility (11.50%) compared to TXRH (9.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STN dropped -67.42% vs TXRH's -76.59%.
TXRH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.29 vs -1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STN and TXRH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer