PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STN vs. ETN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

STN vs. ETN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stantec Inc (STN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STN achieves a -27.91% return, which is significantly lower than ETN's 30.21% return. Over the past 10 years, STN has underperformed ETN with an annualized return of 12.18%, while ETN has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.


STN

1D
-1.87%
1M
-11.24%
YTD
-27.91%
6M
-27.91%
1Y
-37.09%
3Y*
2.06%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
12.18%

ETN

1D
-3.24%
1M
3.06%
YTD
30.21%
6M
30.21%
1Y
17.47%
3Y*
28.70%
5Y*
24.15%
10Y*
24.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STN vs. ETN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STN
Stantec Inc
-27.91%21.08%-1.44%68.90%-13.76%75.67%16.56%31.83%-20.43%12.80%
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
30.21%-2.79%39.51%56.22%-7.18%46.70%29.88%42.76%-10.04%21.54%

Correlation

The correlation between STN and ETN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.43

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2005

0.37

The correlation between STN and ETN shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.43 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

STN:

$7.71B

ETN:

$160.47B

EPS

STN:

CA$3.98

ETN:

$10.24

PE Ratio

STN:

24.13

ETN:

40.25

PEG Ratio

STN:

1.00

ETN:

2.19

PS Ratio

STN:

1.41

ETN:

5.63

PB Ratio

STN:

3.24

ETN:

8.12

Total Revenue (TTM)

STN:

CA$7.77B

ETN:

$28.52B

Gross Profit (TTM)

STN:

CA$3.11B

ETN:

$7.87B

EBITDA (TTM)

STN:

CA$1.05B

ETN:

$4.75B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STN vs. ETN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STN
STN Risk / Return Rank: 33
Overall Rank
STN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STN Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
STN Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
STN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
STN Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

ETN
ETN Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
ETN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETN Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETN Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
ETN Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETN Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STN vs. ETN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc (STN) and Eaton Corporation plc (ETN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STNETNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.77

1.11

-0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.93

0.92

-1.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.02

1.96

-3.98

STN vs. ETN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STN Sharpe Ratio is -1.31, which is lower than the ETN Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STN and ETN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STN vs. ETN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STN drawdown since its inception was -67.42%, roughly equal to the maximum ETN drawdown of -68.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN and ETN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STNETNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.42%

-68.95%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.15%

-19.14%

-21.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.15%

-34.46%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.15%

-34.46%

-5.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.15%

-44.55%

+4.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.07%

-5.39%

-34.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.17%

-14.89%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.35%

8.93%

+9.42%

Volatility

STN vs. ETN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Stantec Inc (STN) is 7.97%, while Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) has a volatility of 16.89%. This indicates that STN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STNETNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.97%

16.89%

-8.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.48%

28.49%

-4.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.34%

34.92%

-6.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.38%

30.66%

-5.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.56%

30.19%

-4.63%

Dividends

STN vs. ETN - Dividend Comparison

STN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, more than ETN's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ETN
Eaton Corporation plc
1.04%1.31%1.13%1.43%2.06%1.76%1.88%3.00%3.85%3.04%3.40%4.23%
STN
Stantec Inc
1.17%0.69%0.78%0.79%1.14%1.17%1.42%1.55%1.91%1.79%1.78%1.69%

Financials

STN vs. ETN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc and Eaton Corporation plc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
2.07B
7.45B
(STN) Total Revenue
(ETN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. STN values in CAD, ETN values in USD

STN vs. ETN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Stantec Inc and Eaton Corporation plc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
39.6%
0
Portfolio components
STN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc reported a gross profit of 821.42M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.

ETN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

STN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc reported an operating income of 175.05M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.

ETN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

STN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc reported a net income of 111.09M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.

ETN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Eaton Corporation plc reported a net income of 866.00M and revenue of 7.45B, resulting in a net margin of 11.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


STN and ETN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETN has higher volatility (16.89%) compared to STN (7.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STN dropped -67.42% vs ETN's -68.95%.

ETN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs -1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STN and ETN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer