STN.TO vs. FAST
STN.TO (Stantec Inc.) and FAST (Fastenal Company) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — STN.TO in Engineering & Construction, FAST in Industrial Distribution. Over the past 10 years, STN.TO returned 12.27%/yr vs 19.94%/yr for FAST. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
STN.TO vs. FAST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STN.TO is traded in CAD, while FAST is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FAST values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STN.TO achieves a -26.21% return, which is significantly lower than FAST's 21.88% return. Over the past 10 years, STN.TO has underperformed FAST with an annualized return of 12.27%, while FAST has yielded a comparatively higher 19.94% annualized return.
STN.TO
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -3.36%
- 6M
- -30.53%
- YTD
- -26.21%
- 1Y
- -36.62%
- 3Y*
- 3.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.48%
- 10Y*
- 12.27%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.97%
FAST
- 1D
- 1.93%
- 1M
- 0.80%
- 6M
- 10.72%
- YTD
- 21.88%
- 1Y
- 3.77%
- 3Y*
- 22.65%
- 5Y*
- 16.83%
- 10Y*
- 19.94%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.14%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | CA$629.99M | CA$589.33M | CA$479.74M |
STN.TO Stantec Inc. | CA$45.53M | CA$50.93M | CA$54.44M |
STN.TO vs. FAST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STN.TO Stantec Inc. | -26.21% | 15.61% | 6.81% | 65.43% | -7.62% | 74.09% | 14.27% | 24.95% | -13.44% | 5.18% |
FAST Fastenal Company | 21.88% | 8.78% | 23.14% | 37.94% | -19.55% | 33.99% | 33.36% | 39.10% | 6.67% | 11.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between STN.TO and FAST is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2006 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
STN.TO:
CA$10.85B
FAST:
$53.96B
STN.TO:
CA$4.30
FAST:
$1.18
STN.TO:
22.14
FAST:
40.01
STN.TO:
0.93
FAST:
4.70
STN.TO:
1.37
FAST:
6.18
STN.TO:
3.21
FAST:
13.29
STN.TO:
CA$7.92B
FAST:
$8.75B
STN.TO:
CA$3.40B
FAST:
$3.91B
STN.TO:
CA$1.13B
FAST:
$1.91B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STN.TO vs. FAST — Risk / Return Rank
STN.TO
FAST
STN.TO vs. FAST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) and Fastenal Company (FAST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STN.TO | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.44 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.05 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 0.18 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.71 | 0.33 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STN.TO vs. FAST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STN.TO drawdown since its inception was -58.12%, which is greater than FAST's maximum drawdown of -41.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STN.TO and FAST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STN.TO | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.12% | -41.82% | -16.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.43% | -21.13% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.43% | -21.13% | -19.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.43% | -25.58% | -14.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.43% | -26.95% | -13.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -39.71% | -4.10% | -35.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.22% | -10.59% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 21.41% | 11.44% | +9.97% |
Volatility
STN.TO vs. FAST - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Stantec Inc. (STN.TO) is 6.57%, while Fastenal Company (FAST) has a volatility of 7.62%. This indicates that STN.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FAST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STN.TO | FAST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.57% | 7.62% | -1.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.04% | 19.67% | +4.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.41% | 25.87% | +2.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 25.18% | -1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.80% | 27.52% | -3.72% |
Dividends
STN.TO vs. FAST - Dividend Comparison
STN.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than FAST's 1.96% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAST Fastenal Company | 1.96% | 2.18% | 2.17% | 2.75% | 2.62% | 1.75% | 2.87% | 2.35% | 2.95% | 2.34% | 2.55% | 2.74% |
STN.TO Stantec Inc. | 0.99% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.73% | 1.11% | 0.93% | 1.50% | 1.58% | 1.84% | 1.42% | 1.33% | 1.22% |
Financials
STN.TO vs. FAST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Stantec Inc. and Fastenal Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
STN.TO vs. FAST - Profitability Comparison
STN.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a gross profit of 819.30M and revenue of 2.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 39.6%.
FAST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 1.06B and revenue of 2.39B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.
STN.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc. reported an operating income of 174.60M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.4%.
FAST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 501.80M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.
STN.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Stantec Inc. reported a net income of 110.80M and revenue of 2.07B, resulting in a net margin of 5.4%.
FAST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 382.80M and revenue of 2.39B, resulting in a net margin of 16.0%.
Frequently Asked Questions
STN.TO and FAST have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for STN.TO and FAST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer