STMDX vs. BIBTX
Compare and contrast key facts about Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX).
STMDX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on May 30, 1980. BIBTX is managed by Sterling Capital. It was launched on Dec 2, 1999.
Performance
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STMDX Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund | 1.24% | 1.35% | 6.25% | 13.28% | -26.17% | 38.53% | -0.54% | 31.77% | -2.82% | 7.81% |
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | -0.70% | 6.93% | 2.17% | 5.53% | -13.24% | -1.21% | 9.24% | 9.29% | -0.34% | 4.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STMDX achieves a 1.24% return, which is significantly higher than BIBTX's -0.70% return. Over the past 10 years, STMDX has outperformed BIBTX with an annualized return of 5.92%, while BIBTX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.09% annualized return.
STMDX
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- -7.04%
- YTD
- 1.24%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- -0.18%
- 3Y*
- 6.09%
- 5Y*
- 3.43%
- 10Y*
- 5.92%
BIBTX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -2.51%
- YTD
- -0.70%
- 6M
- 0.33%
- 1Y
- 3.50%
- 3Y*
- 3.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- 2.09%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STMDX has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than BIBTX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
STMDX vs. BIBTX — Risk / Return Rank
STMDX
BIBTX
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX) and Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STMDX | BIBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.05 | 0.92 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 1.32 | -1.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.16 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.07 | 1.53 | -1.47 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.26 | 4.50 | -4.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STMDX | BIBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.05 | 0.92 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 | 0.04 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.29 | 0.43 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.93 | -0.55 |
Correlation
The correlation between STMDX and BIBTX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Dividend Comparison
STMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.27%, more than BIBTX's 3.79% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STMDX Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund | 6.27% | 6.24% | 7.14% | 8.39% | 8.29% | 7.14% | 4.05% | 9.15% | 5.92% | 4.80% | 7.98% | 2.96% |
BIBTX Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund | 3.79% | 4.09% | 4.11% | 3.17% | 2.82% | 3.15% | 4.03% | 3.12% | 3.22% | 3.00% | 3.27% | 3.55% |
Drawdowns
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STMDX drawdown since its inception was -65.12%, which is greater than BIBTX's maximum drawdown of -18.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STMDX and BIBTX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STMDX | BIBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.12% | -18.28% | -46.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.22% | -3.04% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.43% | -18.28% | -15.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.52% | -18.28% | -22.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.82% | -2.51% | -6.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.12% | -2.38% | -7.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.03% | +2.15% |
Volatility
STMDX vs. BIBTX - Volatility Comparison
Sterling Capital Stratton Real Estate Fund (STMDX) has a higher volatility of 4.16% compared to Sterling Capital Total Return Bond Fund (BIBTX) at 1.61%. This indicates that STMDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIBTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STMDX | BIBTX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 1.61% | +2.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.87% | 2.61% | +6.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.78% | 4.46% | +11.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 5.78% | +12.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.41% | 4.87% | +15.54% |