STIP vs. QMNIX
STIP (iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF) and QMNIX (AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I) are both funds - STIP is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) 0-5 Years Index (Series-L), while QMNIX is a Equity Market Neutral fund actively managed by AQR Funds. STIP is passively managed, while QMNIX is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, STIP returned 3.14%/yr vs 6.17%/yr for QMNIX. At a correlation of -0.09, they often move in opposite directions. STIP charges 0.06%/yr vs 5.48%/yr for QMNIX.
Performance
STIP vs. QMNIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly higher than QMNIX's -6.97% return. Over the past 10 years, STIP has underperformed QMNIX with an annualized return of 3.14%, while QMNIX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.17% annualized return.
STIP
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.09%
- YTD
- 1.87%
- 6M
- 1.97%
- 1Y
- 4.54%
- 3Y*
- 5.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.38%
- 10Y*
- 3.14%
QMNIX
- 1D
- 0.26%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- YTD
- -6.97%
- 6M
- -6.18%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 18.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.62%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
STIP vs. QMNIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 1.87% | 6.03% | 4.77% | 4.63% | -3.02% | 5.68% | 5.18% | 4.89% | 0.54% | 0.74% |
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | -6.97% | 26.54% | 25.85% | 16.61% | 27.26% | 17.64% | -19.62% | -11.30% | -11.73% | 5.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between STIP and QMNIX is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.16 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015 | -0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STIP vs. QMNIX — Risk / Return Rank
STIP
QMNIX
STIP vs. QMNIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STIP | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.68 | 1.12 | +0.57 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.63 | 0.52 | +6.11 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 25.91 | 1.16 | +24.75 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STIP vs. QMNIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum QMNIX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and QMNIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STIP | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.50% | -38.80% | +33.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.69% | -8.30% | +7.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.95% | -8.30% | +7.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -5.50% | -13.86% | +8.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -5.50% | -38.80% | +33.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.20% | -7.26% | +7.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.99% | -10.32% | +9.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.18% | 3.70% | -3.52% |
Volatility
STIP vs. QMNIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.41%, while AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I (QMNIX) has a volatility of 2.56%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMNIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STIP | QMNIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.41% | 2.56% | -2.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.01% | 5.19% | -4.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.45% | 6.62% | -5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.74% | 9.34% | -6.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.45% | 8.28% | -5.83% |
STIP vs. QMNIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNIX's 5.48% expense ratio.
Dividends
STIP vs. QMNIX - Dividend Comparison
STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than QMNIX's 1.51% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QMNIX AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund Class I | 1.51% | 1.41% | 6.10% | 21.48% | 5.95% | 1.39% | 17.42% | 3.83% | 0.48% | 3.48% | 1.51% | 2.57% |
STIP iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF | 4.31% | 4.11% | 2.62% | 2.84% | 6.04% | 4.15% | 1.40% | 2.06% | 2.44% | 1.59% | 0.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STIP and QMNIX have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QMNIX has higher volatility (2.56%) compared to STIP (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs QMNIX's -38.80%.
STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 0.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for STIP and QMNIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer