PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STIP vs. AVDV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STIP vs. AVDV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STIP achieves a 1.87% return, which is significantly lower than AVDV's 14.99% return.


STIP

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.09%
YTD
1.87%
6M
1.97%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.26%
5Y*
3.38%
10Y*
3.14%

AVDV

1D
0.89%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
14.99%
6M
17.18%
1Y
41.91%
3Y*
26.72%
5Y*
13.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STIP vs. AVDV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
1.87%6.03%4.77%4.63%-3.02%5.68%5.18%1.06%
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
14.99%49.37%8.67%16.85%-11.47%15.80%5.01%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between STIP and AVDV is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 26, 2019

0.23

The correlation between STIP and AVDV shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STIP vs. AVDV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STIP
STIP Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
STIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STIP Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
STIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
STIP Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

AVDV
AVDV Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
AVDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVDV Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
AVDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVDV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STIP vs. AVDV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) and Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STIPAVDVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.68

1.46

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.63

3.12

+3.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.91

12.44

+13.46

STIP vs. AVDV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STIP Sharpe Ratio is 3.17, which is comparable to the AVDV Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STIP and AVDV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STIP vs. AVDV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STIP drawdown since its inception was -5.50%, smaller than the maximum AVDV drawdown of -43.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STIP and AVDV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STIPAVDVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.50%

-43.01%

+37.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.69%

-13.19%

+12.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.95%

-14.17%

+13.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.50%

-28.08%

+22.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-2.24%

+2.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.99%

-6.76%

+5.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.18%

3.30%

-3.12%

Volatility

STIP vs. AVDV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF (STIP) is 0.41%, while Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF (AVDV) has a volatility of 6.26%. This indicates that STIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVDV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STIPAVDVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.41%

6.26%

-5.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.01%

13.88%

-12.87%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.45%

16.25%

-14.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.74%

17.41%

-14.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.45%

19.77%

-17.32%

STIP vs. AVDV - Expense Ratio Comparison

STIP has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than AVDV's 0.36% expense ratio.


Dividends

STIP vs. AVDV - Dividend Comparison

STIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, more than AVDV's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
AVDV
Avantis International Small Cap Value ETF
4.11%3.05%4.31%3.29%3.17%2.39%1.67%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%
STIP
iShares 0-5 Year TIPS Bond ETF
4.31%4.11%2.62%2.84%6.04%4.15%1.40%2.06%2.44%1.59%0.89%

Frequently Asked Questions


STIP and AVDV have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVDV has higher volatility (6.26%) compared to STIP (0.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STIP dropped -5.50% vs AVDV's -43.01%.

On 5-year performance, AVDV leads with 13.63% vs 3.38% for STIP. On fees, STIP is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, STIP has been the lower-risk option at 0.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, AVDV has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 3.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

STIP is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVDV.

STIP has the higher dividend yield at 4.31%, compared with 4.11% for AVDV.

STIP is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while AVDV is Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for STIP and 0.36% for AVDV.

STIP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.17 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STIP and AVDV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer