PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFGX vs. SVPFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFGX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than SVPFX's 1.69% return.


STFGX

1D
0.93%
1M
0.71%
YTD
12.03%
6M
11.74%
1Y
32.55%
3Y*
20.00%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
14.02%

SVPFX

1D
0.30%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.69%
6M
1.80%
1Y
4.86%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
12.03%19.19%20.85%17.49%-11.27%15.91%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
1.69%4.19%3.82%5.30%-4.37%0.78%

Correlation

The correlation between STFGX and SVPFX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2021

0.15

The correlation between STFGX and SVPFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.34 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFGX vs. SVPFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STFGX
STFGX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
STFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
STFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

SVPFX
SVPFX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
SVPFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVPFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVPFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
SVPFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVPFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


STFGXSVPFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.48

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

3.84

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.97

12.86

+4.10

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.79, which is higher than the SVPFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFGX and SVPFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFGX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than SVPFX's maximum drawdown of -6.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFGX and SVPFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFGXSVPFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-6.37%

-42.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-1.33%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-5.32%

-16.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-6.37%

-15.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.65%

-0.10%

-0.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-1.91%

-5.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

0.39%

+1.53%

Volatility

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Volatility Comparison

State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) has a higher volatility of 3.85% compared to Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund (SVPFX) at 1.01%. This indicates that STFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SVPFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFGXSVPFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.85%

1.01%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.42%

1.71%

+7.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

2.40%

+9.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.04%

5.61%

+10.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.80%

5.50%

+11.30%

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SVPFX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

STFGX vs. SVPFX - Dividend Comparison

STFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than SVPFX's 2.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
5.77%6.42%8.96%6.39%0.96%15.49%2.81%3.33%4.11%3.40%3.39%13.76%
SVPFX
Goldman Sachs Strategic Volatility Premium Fund
2.47%1.83%4.37%4.29%0.76%0.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


STFGX and SVPFX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

STFGX has higher volatility (3.85%) compared to SVPFX (1.01%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFGX dropped -48.88% vs SVPFX's -6.37%.

STFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 2.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFGX and SVPFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer