PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STFGX vs. RESGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STFGX vs. RESGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STFGX achieves a 12.37% return, which is significantly lower than RESGX's 27.79% return. Over the past 10 years, STFGX has outperformed RESGX with an annualized return of 14.07%, while RESGX has yielded a comparatively lower 13.16% annualized return.


STFGX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.05%
YTD
12.37%
6M
11.65%
1Y
32.84%
3Y*
21.30%
5Y*
13.52%
10Y*
14.07%

RESGX

1D
2.80%
1M
10.96%
YTD
27.79%
6M
28.15%
1Y
44.13%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
10.42%
10Y*
13.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STFGX vs. RESGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
12.37%19.19%20.85%17.49%-11.27%25.90%15.65%28.02%-5.35%16.60%
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
27.79%10.30%11.40%15.59%-14.71%26.58%9.57%24.25%-6.47%22.82%

Correlation

The correlation between STFGX and RESGX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.87

The correlation between STFGX and RESGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STFGX vs. RESGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STFGX
STFGX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
STFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
STFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
STFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
STFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RESGX
RESGX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
RESGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RESGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
RESGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
RESGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
RESGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STFGX vs. RESGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STFGXRESGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.56

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

5.89

-1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.84

21.39

-3.54

STFGX vs. RESGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STFGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is comparable to the RESGX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STFGX and RESGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STFGXRESGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

3.21

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.61

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

0.71

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.72

-0.09

Drawdowns

STFGX vs. RESGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STFGX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than RESGX's maximum drawdown of -37.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFGX and RESGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STFGXRESGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.88%

-37.80%

-11.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.51%

-7.84%

-0.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.65%

-20.50%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.65%

-23.58%

+1.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.46%

-37.80%

+6.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.82%

-5.00%

-2.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.89%

2.15%

-0.26%

Volatility

STFGX vs. RESGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) is 3.22%, while Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio (RESGX) has a volatility of 5.45%. This indicates that STFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RESGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STFGXRESGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.22%

5.45%

-2.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.89%

11.00%

-2.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.39%

14.41%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

17.26%

-1.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.78%

18.71%

-1.93%

STFGX vs. RESGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

STFGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than RESGX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

STFGX vs. RESGX - Dividend Comparison

STFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.71%, less than RESGX's 6.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
RESGX
Glenmede Responsible ESG U.S. Equity Portfolio
6.52%8.24%13.38%9.08%8.17%9.98%0.82%1.90%5.09%0.94%0.72%0.00%
STFGX
State Farm Growth Fund
5.71%6.42%8.96%6.39%0.96%15.49%2.81%3.33%4.11%3.40%3.39%13.76%

Frequently Asked Questions


STFGX and RESGX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RESGX has higher volatility (5.45%) compared to STFGX (3.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, STFGX dropped -48.88% vs RESGX's -37.80%.

RESGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STFGX and RESGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer