STFGX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
STFGX is managed by State Farm. It was launched on Mar 14, 1968. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STFGX State Farm Growth Fund | -2.35% | 19.19% | 20.85% | 17.49% | -11.27% | 25.90% | 15.65% | 28.02% | -5.35% | 16.60% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | -6.77% | 17.06% | 23.89% | 26.12% | -19.53% | 25.66% | 20.79% | 30.92% | -5.32% | 20.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STFGX achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's -6.77% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with STFGX having a 12.82% annualized return and FSKAX not far ahead at 13.23%.
STFGX
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -7.52%
- YTD
- -2.35%
- 6M
- 1.35%
- 1Y
- 20.64%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 11.56%
- 10Y*
- 12.82%
FSKAX
- 1D
- -0.47%
- 1M
- -7.69%
- YTD
- -6.77%
- 6M
- -4.56%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.72%
- 5Y*
- 10.13%
- 10Y*
- 13.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
STFGX has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
STFGX vs. FSKAX — Risk / Return Rank
STFGX
FSKAX
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| STFGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.26 | 0.83 | +0.43 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 1.29 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | 1.04 | +0.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.01 | 5.05 | +1.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| STFGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.26 | 0.83 | +0.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.59 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.78 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between STFGX and FSKAX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
STFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, more than FSKAX's 1.09% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STFGX State Farm Growth Fund | 6.57% | 6.42% | 8.96% | 6.39% | 0.96% | 15.49% | 2.81% | 3.33% | 4.11% | 3.40% | 3.39% | 13.76% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.09% | 1.01% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.94% | 2.54% | 2.07% | 2.43% | 0.82% |
Drawdowns
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STFGX drawdown since its inception was -48.88%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STFGX and FSKAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| STFGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -48.88% | -35.01% | -13.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.60% | -12.42% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.65% | -25.39% | +3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.46% | -35.01% | +3.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.51% | -8.92% | +0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.85% | -4.05% | -3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.62% | 2.57% | +0.05% |
Volatility
STFGX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Farm Growth Fund (STFGX) is 4.18%, while Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) has a volatility of 4.42%. This indicates that STFGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| STFGX | FSKAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | 4.42% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.58% | 9.40% | -0.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.32% | 18.50% | -1.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 17.38% | -1.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 18.42% | -1.69% |