PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STEN vs. PMAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

STEN vs. PMAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STEN achieves a 7.79% return, which is significantly higher than PMAU's 2.95% return.


STEN

1D
-0.30%
1M
3.31%
YTD
7.79%
6M
8.22%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PMAU

1D
-0.02%
1M
0.89%
YTD
2.95%
6M
3.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEN vs. PMAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between STEN and PMAU is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2025

0.94

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

STEN vs. PMAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Large Cap 10% Target Buffer Sep ETF (STEN) and PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - August (PMAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

STEN vs. PMAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STENPMAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.67

2.90

-1.23

Drawdowns

STEN vs. PMAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STEN drawdown since its inception was -6.21%, which is greater than PMAU's maximum drawdown of -1.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEN and PMAU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


STENPMAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-1.79%

-4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-0.02%

-0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.92%

-0.17%

-0.75%

Volatility

STEN vs. PMAU - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


STENPMAUDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.24%

2.51%

+6.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.24%

2.51%

+6.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.24%

2.51%

+6.73%

STEN vs. PMAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both STEN and PMAU have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

STEN vs. PMAU - Dividend Comparison

STEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%, while PMAU has not paid dividends to shareholders.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, STEN and PMAU move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Both ETFs have the same 0.50% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

STEN and PMAU have the same expense ratio: 0.50% per year.

STEN has the higher dividend yield at 0.29%, compared with 0.00% for PMAU.

They also come from different issuers: BlackRock and PGIM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for STEN and PMAU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer