STEA.L vs. DHYG.L
STEA.L (PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc)) and DHYG.L (iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)) are both High Yield Bonds funds - STEA.L tracks the ICE BofA 0-5 Year US High Yield Constrained Index while DHYG.L tracks the Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate High Yield ESG SRI Bond Index (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, STEA.L returned 6.26%/yr vs 8.36%/yr for DHYG.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. STEA.L charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DHYG.L.
Performance
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
STEA.L is traded in EUR, while DHYG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the DHYG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, STEA.L achieves a 0.62% return, which is significantly lower than DHYG.L's 4.43% return.
STEA.L
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.37%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 1Y
- 4.09%
- 3Y*
- 6.26%
- 5Y*
- 3.13%
- 10Y*
- —
DHYG.L
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 2.04%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- YTD
- 4.43%
- 1Y
- 8.19%
- 3Y*
- 8.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
STEA.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.62% | 6.59% | 6.65% | 9.15% | -6.91% | -0.04% |
DHYG.L iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 4.43% | 3.03% | 12.93% | 13.11% | -17.86% | 1.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between STEA.L and DHYG.L is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2021 | 0.64 |
Over the past year, the correlation between STEA.L and DHYG.L has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.64, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L — Risk / Return Rank
STEA.L
DHYG.L
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (STEA.L) and iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DHYG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| STEA.L | DHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.25 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.68 | -0.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.92 | 9.00 | -1.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum STEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, roughly equal to the maximum DHYG.L drawdown of -22.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEA.L and DHYG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| STEA.L | DHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.62% | -22.48% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -3.04% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.85% | -8.54% | +3.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -0.31% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.17% | -6.41% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.51% | 0.91% | -0.40% |
Volatility
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) (STEA.L) is 0.57%, while iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (DHYG.L) has a volatility of 1.47%. This indicates that STEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DHYG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| STEA.L | DHYG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.57% | 1.47% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.70% | 4.09% | -1.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.36% | 5.92% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.30% | 9.32% | -4.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.55% | 9.32% | -2.77% |
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
STEA.L has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DHYG.L's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
STEA.L vs. DHYG.L - Dividend Comparison
STEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DHYG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DHYG.L iShares $ High Yield Corp Bond ESG SRI UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) | 6.79% | 6.70% | 7.02% | 6.41% | 6.51% |
STEA.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR Hedged (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
STEA.L and DHYG.L have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DHYG.L is cheaper at 0.27% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DHYG.L is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for STEA.L.
STEA.L tracks ICE BofA 0-5 Year US High Yield Constrained Index, while DHYG.L tracks Bloomberg MSCI US Corporate High Yield ESG SRI Bond Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for STEA.L and 0.27% for DHYG.L.
Find the right allocation for STEA.L and DHYG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer