STEA.L vs. MINT.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

STEA.L (PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc) and MINT.L (PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - STEA.L is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc, while MINT.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, STEA.L returned 3.11%/yr vs 4.07%/yr for MINT.L. At a correlation of -0.22, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

STEA.L is traded in EUR, while MINT.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MINT.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STEA.L achieves a 0.53% return, which is significantly lower than MINT.L's 4.79% return.

STEA.L

• 1D: -0.15%
• 1M: -0.21%
• 6M: 0.45%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 1Y: 4.04%
• 3Y*: 6.23%
• 5Y*: 3.11%
• 10Y*: —

MINT.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.37%
• 6M: 3.66%
• YTD: 4.79%
• 1Y: 5.69%
• 3Y*: 4.49%
• 5Y*: 4.07%
• 10Y*: 2.28%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
STEA.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc	0.53%	6.59%	6.65%	9.15%	-6.91%	3.43%	1.48%	6.80%	-3.39%	0.00%
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	4.79%	-7.76%	12.73%	2.55%	5.48%	7.38%	-7.05%	5.61%	6.42%	-1.83%

Correlation

The correlation between STEA.L and MINT.L is -0.26, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.23
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2017	-0.22

Return for Risk

STEA.L vs. MINT.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STEA.L

STEA.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
STEA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 40
STEA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
STEA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 40
STEA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
STEA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 56

MINT.L

MINT.L Risk / Return Rank: 99
MINT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
MINT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L) and PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	STEA.L	MINT.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.18	0.97	+0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	1.42	+0.39
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.18	+0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.89	1.62	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.74	4.10	+3.64

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STEA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the MINT.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STEA.L and MINT.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STEA.L drawdown since its inception was -22.62%, which is greater than MINT.L's maximum drawdown of -15.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STEA.L and MINT.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	STEA.L	MINT.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.62%	-15.22%	-7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.10%	-3.70%	+1.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.85%	-11.32%	+6.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-10.29%	-11.40%	+1.11%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-15.22%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-4.49%	+4.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.17%	-5.74%	+3.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.52%	1.46%	-0.94%

Volatility

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc (STEA.L) is 0.58%, while PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF (MINT.L) has a volatility of 1.21%. This indicates that STEA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	STEA.L	MINT.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.58%	1.21%	-0.63%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.70%	4.44%	-1.74%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.36%	6.16%	-2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.30%	7.54%	-2.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	6.55%	7.25%	-0.70%

Dividends

STEA.L vs. MINT.L - Dividend Comparison

STEA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MINT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MINT.L PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF	4.36%	4.43%	5.18%	4.81%	1.51%	0.34%	1.17%	2.63%	2.33%	1.56%	1.31%	0.79%
STEA.L PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both STEA.L and MINT.L in my portfolio?

STEA.L and MINT.L have a correlation of -0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

What is the main difference between STEA.L and MINT.L?

STEA.L is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while MINT.L is Global Equities. STEA.L tracks PIMCO Advantage US Short-Term High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Hedged) Acc, while MINT.L tracks PIMCO ETFs PLC - US Dollar Short Maturity UCITS ETF.