PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STCE vs. BCDF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STCE vs. BCDF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STCE vs. BCDF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
STCE
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF
-13.31%36.12%41.76%108.65%-38.86%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
1.72%11.63%14.87%24.99%-22.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STCE achieves a -13.31% return, which is significantly lower than BCDF's 1.72% return.


STCE

1D
6.43%
1M
-8.21%
YTD
-13.31%
6M
-32.83%
1Y
61.55%
3Y*
38.53%
5Y*
10Y*

BCDF

1D
2.24%
1M
-3.88%
YTD
1.72%
6M
-0.09%
1Y
13.04%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STCE vs. BCDF - Expense Ratio Comparison

STCE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than BCDF's 0.85% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STCE vs. BCDF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STCE
STCE Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
STCE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STCE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
STCE Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
STCE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
STCE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

BCDF
BCDF Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
BCDF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BCDF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
BCDF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
BCDF Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
BCDF Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STCE vs. BCDF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) and Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STCEBCDFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.19

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.15

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.07

1.40

-0.33

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.24

3.61

-1.37

STCE vs. BCDF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STCE Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the BCDF Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STCE and BCDF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STCEBCDFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

0.78

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.38

+0.03

Correlation

The correlation between STCE and BCDF is 0.65, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

STCE vs. BCDF - Dividend Comparison

STCE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.26%, less than BCDF's 2.48% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
STCE
Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF
2.26%1.96%0.64%0.31%1.46%
BCDF
Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF
2.48%2.53%1.63%0.69%0.38%

Drawdowns

STCE vs. BCDF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STCE drawdown since its inception was -54.11%, which is greater than BCDF's maximum drawdown of -27.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STCE and BCDF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STCEBCDFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.11%

-27.70%

-26.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-54.11%

-8.84%

-45.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.16%

-5.09%

-46.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.33%

-10.23%

-11.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

25.86%

3.44%

+22.42%

Volatility

STCE vs. BCDF - Volatility Comparison

Schwab Crypto Thematic ETF (STCE) has a higher volatility of 18.63% compared to Horizon Kinetics Blockchain Development ETF (BCDF) at 5.22%. This indicates that STCE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCDF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STCEBCDFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.63%

5.22%

+13.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

50.27%

11.75%

+38.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.03%

16.82%

+47.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

56.19%

17.06%

+39.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

56.19%

17.06%

+39.13%