PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
STAX vs. PUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

STAX vs. PUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

STAX vs. PUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
0.42%4.12%2.35%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
0.64%4.16%1.74%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, STAX achieves a 0.42% return, which is significantly lower than PUSH's 0.64% return.


STAX

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.94%
YTD
0.42%
6M
0.92%
1Y
3.65%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PUSH

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.37%
YTD
0.64%
6M
1.46%
1Y
3.70%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


STAX vs. PUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

STAX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PUSH's 0.15% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

STAX vs. PUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

STAX
STAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
STAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
STAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
STAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
STAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

PUSH
PUSH Risk / Return Rank: 9595
Overall Rank
PUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
PUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

STAX vs. PUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) and PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


STAXPUSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.57

2.27

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.34

3.31

+0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

1.61

+0.08

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

4.34

-1.69

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.68

15.34

-5.66

STAX vs. PUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current STAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.57, which is comparable to the PUSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of STAX and PUSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


STAXPUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.57

2.27

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.64

2.84

-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between STAX and PUSH is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

STAX vs. PUSH - Dividend Comparison

STAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%, less than PUSH's 3.60% yield.


TTM20252024
STAX
Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF
3.22%3.16%3.43%
PUSH
PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF
3.60%3.45%1.86%

Drawdowns

STAX vs. PUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum STAX drawdown since its inception was -1.42%, which is greater than PUSH's maximum drawdown of -0.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for STAX and PUSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


STAXPUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-0.85%

-0.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.42%

-0.85%

-0.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.37%

-0.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.21%

-0.11%

-0.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.39%

0.24%

+0.15%

Volatility

STAX vs. PUSH - Volatility Comparison

Macquarie Tax-Free USA Short Term ETF (STAX) has a higher volatility of 0.47% compared to PGIM Ultra Short Municipal Bond ETF (PUSH) at 0.23%. This indicates that STAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


STAXPUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

0.23%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.69%

1.08%

-0.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

1.64%

-0.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.40%

1.33%

+0.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.40%

1.33%

+0.07%