PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

SSXF.L is traded in EUR, while IGLH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IGLH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSXF.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than IGLH.L's 3.57% return.


SSXF.L

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.70%
6M
0.36%
YTD
-0.24%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
5.05%
5Y*
-2.18%
10Y*
0.31%

IGLH.L

1D
0.04%
1M
1.12%
6M
1.53%
YTD
3.57%
1Y
1.87%
3Y*
2.05%
5Y*
-1.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
SSXF.L
iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
-0.24%1.57%4.52%10.82%-24.14%2.57%2.91%17.08%-2.16%
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
3.57%-4.55%5.47%7.01%-18.04%3.94%-0.67%12.16%-1.93%

Correlation

The correlation between SSXF.L and IGLH.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2018

0.74

The correlation between SSXF.L and IGLH.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.67 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSXF.L
SSXF.L Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
SSXF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSXF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSXF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
SSXF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSXF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

IGLH.L
IGLH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
IGLH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) and iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSXF.LIGLH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.05

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.56

0.45

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.25

1.05

+0.20

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSXF.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is higher than the IGLH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSXF.L and IGLH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSXF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, which is greater than IGLH.L's maximum drawdown of -19.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXF.L and IGLH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSXF.LIGLH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.80%

-19.90%

-13.90%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.58%

-4.18%

-2.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.00%

-6.43%

-1.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.80%

-19.70%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.47%

-9.38%

-3.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-7.71%

-0.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

1.78%

+1.16%

Volatility

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (IGLH.L) at 1.47%. This indicates that SSXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGLH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSXF.LIGLH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.92%

1.47%

+0.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.03%

4.02%

+2.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.57%

7.11%

+0.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.87%

8.22%

+1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.83%

8.27%

+1.56%

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than IGLH.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

SSXF.L vs. IGLH.L - Dividend Comparison

SSXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, more than IGLH.L's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IGLH.L
iShares Global Government Bond UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
1.59%2.91%2.33%1.40%0.73%0.55%0.97%1.19%0.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SSXF.L
iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)
2.33%4.34%3.88%3.14%3.09%2.23%2.35%2.55%2.89%2.90%3.78%2.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSXF.L and IGLH.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SSXF.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SSXF.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IGLH.L.

SSXF.L is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while IGLH.L is Global Bonds. SSXF.L tracks iBoxx Sterling Corporate Bond ex Financials Index, while IGLH.L tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate TR Hdg GBP. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSXF.L and 0.25% for IGLH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSXF.L and IGLH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer