SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L
SSXF.L (iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist)) and ERNU.L (iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds from iShares - SSXF.L tracks the iBoxx Sterling Corporate Bond ex Financials Index while ERNU.L tracks the Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, SSXF.L returned 0.31%/yr vs 2.42%/yr for ERNU.L. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. SSXF.L charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for ERNU.L.
Performance
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
SSXF.L is traded in EUR, while ERNU.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ERNU.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SSXF.L achieves a -0.24% return, which is significantly lower than ERNU.L's 4.91% return. Over the past 10 years, SSXF.L has underperformed ERNU.L with an annualized return of 0.31%, while ERNU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 2.42% annualized return.
SSXF.L
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- -0.24%
- 1Y
- 3.15%
- 3Y*
- 5.05%
- 5Y*
- -2.18%
- 10Y*
- 0.31%
ERNU.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.75%
- 6M
- 3.41%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.56%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | -0.24% | 1.57% | 4.52% | 10.82% | -24.14% | 2.57% | 2.91% | 17.08% | -2.97% | -0.09% |
ERNU.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF | 4.91% | -7.53% | 12.57% | 1.77% | 7.59% | 8.13% | -7.47% | 6.19% | 6.66% | -11.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between SSXF.L and ERNU.L is -0.24, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2013 | 0.07 |
The correlation between SSXF.L and ERNU.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.24 (1 year) to 0.07 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L — Risk / Return Rank
SSXF.L
ERNU.L
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) and iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| SSXF.L | ERNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.64 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.16 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.56 | 1.78 | -1.22 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 4.10 | -2.85 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SSXF.L drawdown since its inception was -33.80%, smaller than the maximum ERNU.L drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSXF.L and ERNU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SSXF.L | ERNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.80% | -39.15% | +5.35% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.58% | -3.15% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.00% | -11.37% | +3.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.80% | -11.44% | -22.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.80% | -15.83% | -17.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -4.74% | -7.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.30% | -18.35% | +10.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.94% | 1.37% | +1.57% |
Volatility
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) (SSXF.L) has a higher volatility of 1.92% compared to iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (ERNU.L) at 1.10%. This indicates that SSXF.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERNU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SSXF.L | ERNU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.92% | 1.10% | +0.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.03% | 4.53% | +1.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.57% | 6.22% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.87% | 7.84% | +2.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.83% | 7.75% | +2.08% |
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SSXF.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than ERNU.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
SSXF.L vs. ERNU.L - Dividend Comparison
SSXF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%, less than ERNU.L's 4.33% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERNU.L iShares USD Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF | 4.33% | 4.68% | 5.46% | 4.99% | 1.56% | 0.48% | 1.65% | 2.77% | 2.17% | 1.43% | 0.93% | 0.70% |
SSXF.L iShares £ Corp Bond ex-Financials UCITS ETF GBP (Dist) | 2.33% | 4.34% | 3.88% | 3.14% | 3.09% | 2.23% | 2.35% | 2.55% | 2.89% | 2.90% | 3.78% | 2.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SSXF.L and ERNU.L have a correlation of -0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ERNU.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ERNU.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SSXF.L.
SSXF.L tracks iBoxx Sterling Corporate Bond ex Financials Index, while ERNU.L tracks Bloomberg US Corp 1-3 Yr TR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for SSXF.L and 0.09% for ERNU.L.
Find the right allocation for SSXF.L and ERNU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer