PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSTK vs. MOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

SSTK vs. MOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) and Momo Inc. (MOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSTK achieves a -54.69% return, which is significantly lower than MOMO's -2.12% return. Over the past 10 years, SSTK has underperformed MOMO with an annualized return of -14.64%, while MOMO has yielded a comparatively higher -2.11% annualized return.


SSTK

1D
-2.83%
1M
-42.27%
6M
-54.41%
YTD
-54.69%
1Y
-53.40%
3Y*
-44.03%
5Y*
-37.04%
10Y*
-14.64%

MOMO

1D
0.99%
1M
7.75%
6M
-7.76%
YTD
-2.12%
1Y
-28.29%
3Y*
-11.49%
5Y*
-7.51%
10Y*
-2.11%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSTK vs. MOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSTK
Shutterstock, Inc.
-54.69%-32.71%-35.06%-6.41%-51.70%55.94%69.71%19.08%-11.27%-9.45%
MOMO
Momo Inc.
-2.12%-10.17%21.75%-15.26%12.98%-32.96%-56.80%43.24%-2.98%33.19%

Correlation

The correlation between SSTK and MOMO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2014

0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between SSTK and MOMO has dropped to 0.05 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

SSTK:

$303.09M

MOMO:

$998.62M

EPS

SSTK:

-$0.57

MOMO:

CN¥4.45

PS Ratio

SSTK:

0.32

MOMO:

0.67

PB Ratio

SSTK:

0.55

MOMO:

0.62

Total Revenue (TTM)

SSTK:

$946.48M

MOMO:

CN¥10.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

SSTK:

$543.91M

MOMO:

CN¥3.89B

EBITDA (TTM)

SSTK:

$110.64M

MOMO:

CN¥1.70B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSTK vs. MOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSTK
SSTK Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
SSTK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSTK Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSTK Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
SSTK Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSTK Martin Ratio Rank: 22
Martin Ratio Rank

MOMO
MOMO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
MOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
MOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
MOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
MOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSTK vs. MOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) and Momo Inc. (MOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSTKMOMODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.84

0.84

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.80

-0.75

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.85

-1.09

-0.76

SSTK vs. MOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSTK Sharpe Ratio is -0.88, which is comparable to the MOMO Sharpe Ratio of -1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSTK and MOMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSTK vs. MOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSTK drawdown since its inception was -92.11%, roughly equal to the maximum MOMO drawdown of -90.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSTK and MOMO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSTKMOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.11%

-90.31%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-66.67%

-37.97%

-28.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-83.05%

-50.73%

-32.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.11%

-65.90%

-26.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-92.11%

-90.31%

-1.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-92.11%

-81.25%

-10.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-48.31%

-54.64%

+6.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

28.94%

26.01%

+2.93%

Volatility

SSTK vs. MOMO - Volatility Comparison

Shutterstock, Inc. (SSTK) has a higher volatility of 41.18% compared to Momo Inc. (MOMO) at 9.23%. This indicates that SSTK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSTKMOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

41.18%

9.23%

+31.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

51.82%

21.36%

+30.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.17%

28.42%

+32.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

50.25%

61.69%

-11.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

46.10%

59.13%

-13.03%

Dividends

SSTK vs. MOMO - Dividend Comparison

SSTK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.73%, more than MOMO's 4.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
MOMO
Momo Inc.
4.58%4.58%7.00%10.36%7.13%7.13%5.44%1.85%0.00%
SSTK
Shutterstock, Inc.
16.73%6.91%3.95%2.24%1.82%0.76%0.95%0.00%8.33%

Financials

SSTK vs. MOMO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Shutterstock, Inc. and Momo Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
199.17M
2.37B
(SSTK) Total Revenue
(MOMO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. SSTK values in USD, MOMO values in CNY

SSTK vs. MOMO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Shutterstock, Inc. and Momo Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
52.4%
38.7%
Portfolio components
SSTK - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shutterstock, Inc. reported a gross profit of 104.38M and revenue of 199.17M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.4%.

MOMO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Momo Inc. reported a gross profit of 917.07M and revenue of 2.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.7%.

SSTK - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shutterstock, Inc. reported an operating income of -30.95M and revenue of 199.17M, resulting in an operating margin of -15.5%.

MOMO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Momo Inc. reported an operating income of 295.46M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

SSTK - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Shutterstock, Inc. reported a net income of -47.57M and revenue of 199.17M, resulting in a net margin of -23.9%.

MOMO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Momo Inc. reported a net income of 289.29M and revenue of 2.37B, resulting in a net margin of 12.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


SSTK and MOMO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SSTK has higher volatility (41.18%) compared to MOMO (9.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSTK dropped -92.11% vs MOMO's -90.31%.

SSTK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.88 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSTK and MOMO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer