PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
SSSFX vs. HFCGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, SSSFX achieves a 16.91% return, which is significantly higher than HFCGX's 12.44% return. Over the past 10 years, SSSFX has underperformed HFCGX with an annualized return of 9.40%, while HFCGX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.94% annualized return.


SSSFX

1D
0.25%
1M
1.65%
6M
7.90%
YTD
16.91%
1Y
25.37%
3Y*
6.62%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
9.40%
ALL TIME*
9.57%

HFCGX

1D
3.16%
1M
2.88%
6M
7.39%
YTD
12.44%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
13.94%
10Y*
11.94%
ALL TIME*
9.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
SSSFX
SouthernSun Small Cap
16.91%4.72%3.46%12.52%-1.86%21.87%14.08%35.45%-24.32%18.03%
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
12.44%4.78%31.45%19.58%-4.97%29.94%17.73%20.70%-21.39%16.60%

Correlation

The correlation between SSSFX and HFCGX is 0.62, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2003

0.83

Over the past year, the correlation between SSSFX and HFCGX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

SSSFX vs. HFCGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

SSSFX
SSSFX Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SSSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SSSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
SSSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
SSSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
SSSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

HFCGX
HFCGX Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
HFCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HFCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
HFCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
HFCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
HFCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX) and Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


SSSFXHFCGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.23

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.57

2.39

-0.82

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.09

6.64

-2.55

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current SSSFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the HFCGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of SSSFX and HFCGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSSFX drawdown since its inception was -65.85%, which is greater than HFCGX's maximum drawdown of -62.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSSFX and HFCGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


SSSFXHFCGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.85%

-62.35%

-3.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.39%

-7.82%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-32.76%

-22.86%

-9.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.76%

-26.30%

-6.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.20%

-54.22%

+9.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.15%

-4.09%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.85%

-15.17%

+4.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.53%

2.81%

+2.72%

Volatility

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SouthernSun Small Cap (SSSFX) is 4.78%, while Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund (HFCGX) has a volatility of 6.56%. This indicates that SSSFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HFCGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


SSSFXHFCGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.78%

6.56%

-1.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.22%

11.96%

+2.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.16%

14.57%

+5.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.49%

23.87%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.28%

25.88%

-2.60%

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSSFX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is lower than HFCGX's 1.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

SSSFX vs. HFCGX - Dividend Comparison

SSSFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.31%, while HFCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HFCGX
Hennessy Cornerstone Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%14.11%0.38%3.58%26.58%0.00%0.00%10.47%0.00%0.00%0.11%
SSSFX
SouthernSun Small Cap
4.31%5.04%13.93%13.87%9.40%11.51%0.23%5.29%4.77%0.00%0.00%12.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


SSSFX and HFCGX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HFCGX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to SSSFX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SSSFX dropped -65.85% vs HFCGX's -62.35%.

HFCGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for SSSFX and HFCGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer