SSS vs. EZBC

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and EZBC (Franklin Bitcoin ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds - SSS tracks the S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index while EZBC tracks the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. SSS charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for EZBC.

Performance

SSS vs. EZBC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSS

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EZBC

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: -0.11%
• 6M: -32.92%
• YTD: -26.74%
• 1Y: -46.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSS vs. EZBC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	-3.86%
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	-23.69%

Correlation

The correlation between SSS and EZBC is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	0.87

Return for Risk

SSS vs. EZBC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EZBC

EZBC Risk / Return Rank: 2
EZBC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
EZBC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Omega Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
EZBC Martin Ratio Rank: 2

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSS vs. EZBC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSS	EZBC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-1.05	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	-1.59	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	0.82	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.87	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-1.39	—

Drawdowns

SSS vs. EZBC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum EZBC drawdown of -53.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and EZBC.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSS	EZBC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-53.35%	+38.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-53.35%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-49.00%	+44.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-17.80%	+11.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	33.27%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSS	EZBC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	10.68%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	34.60%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.37%	44.22%	-20.85%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	49.80%	-26.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.37%	49.80%	-26.43%

SSS vs. EZBC - Expense Ratio Comparison

SSS has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than EZBC's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

SSS vs. EZBC - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, while EZBC has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
EZBC Franklin Bitcoin ETF	0.00%
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSS and EZBC in my portfolio?

SSS and EZBC have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSS or EZBC?

On fees, EZBC is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSS or EZBC?

EZBC is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for SSS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSS or EZBC?

SSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.00% for EZBC.

What is the main difference between SSS and EZBC?

SSS tracks S&P 500 and S&P Solana 75/25 Blend Index, while EZBC tracks CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for SSS and 0.19% for EZBC.