SSS vs. BTCZ

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

SSS (CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF) and BTCZ (T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF) are both Cryptocurrency funds. SSS is passively managed, while BTCZ is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.87, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

SSS vs. BTCZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

SSS

• 1D: -0.76%
• 1M: 2.20%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCZ

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -2.75%
• 6M: 58.70%
• YTD: 30.05%
• 1Y: 99.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

SSS vs. BTCZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	-3.86%
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	25.00%

Correlation

The correlation between SSS and BTCZ is -0.87, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 30, 2026	-0.87

Return for Risk

SSS vs. BTCZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SSS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BTCZ

BTCZ Risk / Return Rank: 42
BTCZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
BTCZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
BTCZ Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BTCZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
BTCZ Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

SSS vs. BTCZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF (SSS) and T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF (BTCZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	SSS	BTCZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	1.83	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.22	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.03	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	4.52	—

Drawdowns

SSS vs. BTCZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum SSS drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum BTCZ drawdown of -91.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SSS and BTCZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	SSS	BTCZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-91.06%	+76.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-49.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.66%	-79.03%	+74.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.55%	-73.80%	+67.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	22.01%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	SSS	BTCZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	21.36%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	68.70%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.37%	88.71%	-65.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.37%	96.29%	-72.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.37%	96.29%	-72.92%

SSS vs. BTCZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both SSS and BTCZ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

SSS vs. BTCZ - Dividend Comparison

SSS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.09%, more than BTCZ's 0.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BTCZ T-Rex 2X Inverse Bitcoin Daily Target ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.08%
SSS CYBER HORNET S&P 500 and Solana 75/25 Strategy ETF	0.09%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both SSS and BTCZ in my portfolio?

SSS and BTCZ have a correlation of -0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, SSS or BTCZ?

Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, SSS or BTCZ?

SSS and BTCZ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, SSS or BTCZ?

SSS has the higher dividend yield at 0.09%, compared with 0.01% for BTCZ.

What is the main difference between SSS and BTCZ?

They also come from different issuers: CYBER HORNET and T-Rex.